MLNIX vs. TBCIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MLNIX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio) and TBCIX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class) are both mutual funds - MLNIX is a Global Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while TBCIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, MLNIX returned 10.09%/yr vs 10.38%/yr for TBCIX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MLNIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for TBCIX.

Performance

MLNIX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio (MLNIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLNIX achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's -1.76% return.

MLNIX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 2.16%
• 6M: 5.52%
• YTD: 6.77%
• 1Y: 12.27%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.45%

TBCIX

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -0.93%
• 6M: -0.05%
• YTD: -1.76%
• 1Y: 6.93%
• 3Y*: 23.19%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 16.79%
• ALL TIME*: 16.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MLNIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MLNIX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLNIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio	6.77%	17.59%	32.90%	18.42%	-22.28%	17.75%	23.52%	33.11%	-14.62%	21.09%
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class	-1.76%	18.94%	48.73%	49.61%	-38.48%	18.30%	34.90%	30.30%	2.13%	36.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MLNIX and TBCIX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.84

The correlation between MLNIX and TBCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MLNIX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLNIX

MLNIX Risk / Return Rank: 14
MLNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MLNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
MLNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
MLNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MLNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

TBCIX

TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 7
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLNIX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio (MLNIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLNIX	TBCIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	0.26	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	0.48	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.06	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	0.27	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.31	0.80	+1.51

MLNIX vs. TBCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLNIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the TBCIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLNIX and TBCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLNIX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLNIX drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum TBCIX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLNIX and TBCIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLNIX	TBCIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-43.26%	+8.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.10%	-16.96%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.47%	-23.06%	+3.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.85%	-43.26%	+11.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.56%	+7.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-8.04%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.53%	5.66%	-1.13%

Volatility

MLNIX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio (MLNIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) have volatilities of 6.05% and 6.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLNIX	TBCIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.05%	6.15%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.88%	14.37%	+0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.28%	17.73%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.68%	24.16%	-4.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.23%	22.85%	-2.62%

MLNIX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLNIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLNIX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison

MLNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than TBCIX's 5.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MLNIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio	1.76%	1.88%	0.20%	0.79%	0.30%	3.80%	0.00%	1.11%	0.72%	0.30%	0.00%
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class	5.30%	5.20%	18.28%	3.47%	5.84%	10.03%	1.18%	0.59%	2.50%	3.05%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLNIX and TBCIX in my portfolio?

MLNIX and TBCIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLNIX or TBCIX?

TBCIX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to MLNIX (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLNIX dropped -34.79% vs TBCIX's -43.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.