MLKN vs. HTHT
MLKN (MillerKnoll, Inc.) and HTHT (Huazhu Group Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — MLKN in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances, HTHT in Lodging. Over the past 10 years, MLKN returned -1.06%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for HTHT. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MLKN vs. HTHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLKN achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly higher than HTHT's -6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MLKN has underperformed HTHT with an annualized return of -1.06%, while HTHT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.89% annualized return.
MLKN
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- YTD
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- -9.28%
- 10Y*
- -1.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.10%
HTHT
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 1Y
- 43.31%
- 3Y*
- 1.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $70.60M | $62.75M | $89.89M | |
| $15.62M | $15.14M | $14.96M |
MLKN vs. HTHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLKN MillerKnoll, Inc. | 25.74% | -15.73% | -13.01% | 32.01% | -44.89% | 17.99% | -17.99% | 40.49% | -22.84% | 19.65% |
HTHT Huazhu Group Limited | -6.89% | 50.26% | 0.96% | -19.00% | 14.31% | -17.08% | 13.28% | 39.96% | -19.86% | 180.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLKN and HTHT is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2010 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MLKN and HTHT has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MLKN:
$1.53B
HTHT:
$13.11B
MLKN:
$1.27
HTHT:
CN¥15.29
MLKN:
17.68
HTHT:
18.85
MLKN:
1.49
HTHT:
0.25
MLKN:
0.41
HTHT:
3.64
MLKN:
1.11
HTHT:
8.64
MLKN:
$3.84B
HTHT:
CN¥25.78B
MLKN:
$1.49B
HTHT:
CN¥10.45B
MLKN:
$114.50M
HTHT:
CN¥8.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLKN vs. HTHT — Risk / Return Rank
MLKN
HTHT
MLKN vs. HTHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) and Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLKN | HTHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.63 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | 4.03 | -2.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLKN vs. HTHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLKN drawdown since its inception was -79.45%, which is greater than HTHT's maximum drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLKN and HTHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLKN | HTHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.45% | -64.02% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.80% | -26.78% | -11.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.31% | -40.74% | -12.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.76% | -56.97% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.06% | -64.02% | -8.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.70% | -21.85% | -25.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.11% | -25.76% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.40% | 10.80% | +10.60% |
Volatility
MLKN vs. HTHT - Volatility Comparison
MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) has a higher volatility of 11.11% compared to Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT) at 8.24%. This indicates that MLKN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLKN | HTHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.11% | 8.24% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.07% | 22.30% | +18.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.79% | 30.41% | +18.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.91% | 49.42% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 48.95% | -3.97% |
Dividends
MLKN vs. HTHT - Dividend Comparison
MLKN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than HTHT's 4.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTHT Huazhu Group Limited | 4.94% | 3.78% | 1.91% | 2.78% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 2.18% |
MLKN MillerKnoll, Inc. | 3.33% | 4.10% | 3.32% | 2.81% | 3.57% | 1.91% | 1.18% | 1.96% | 2.50% | 1.75% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Financials
MLKN vs. HTHT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MillerKnoll, Inc. and Huazhu Group Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MLKN vs. HTHT - Profitability Comparison
MLKN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported a gross profit of 395.60M and revenue of 1.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
HTHT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported a gross profit of 2.31B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
MLKN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported an operating income of 49.50M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
HTHT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.9%.
MLKN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
HTHT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported a net income of 812.06M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MLKN and HTHT have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLKN has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to HTHT (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLKN dropped -79.45% vs HTHT's -64.02%.
HTHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLKN and HTHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer