MLKN vs. HTHT
Compare and contrast key facts about MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) and Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT).
Performance
MLKN vs. HTHT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLKN vs. HTHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLKN MillerKnoll, Inc. | -20.18% | -15.73% | -13.01% | 32.01% | -44.89% | 17.99% | -17.99% | 40.49% | -22.84% | 19.65% |
HTHT Huazhu Group Limited | 6.89% | 50.26% | 0.96% | -19.00% | 14.31% | -17.08% | 13.28% | 39.96% | -19.86% | 180.24% |
Fundamentals
MLKN:
$999.19M
HTHT:
$16.38B
MLKN:
$0.80
HTHT:
$15.60
MLKN:
18.04
HTHT:
3.22
MLKN:
1.33
HTHT:
0.04
MLKN:
0.26
HTHT:
0.65
MLKN:
0.71
HTHT:
1.28
MLKN:
$3.80B
HTHT:
$25.22B
MLKN:
$1.47B
HTHT:
$9.93B
MLKN:
$322.30M
HTHT:
$8.67B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLKN achieves a -20.18% return, which is significantly lower than HTHT's 6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MLKN has underperformed HTHT with an annualized return of -4.83%, while HTHT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.12% annualized return.
MLKN
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -28.20%
- YTD
- -20.18%
- 6M
- -16.77%
- 1Y
- -21.31%
- 3Y*
- -7.66%
- 5Y*
- -16.58%
- 10Y*
- -4.83%
HTHT
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -8.23%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 28.59%
- 1Y
- 43.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- 20.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLKN vs. HTHT — Risk / Return Rank
MLKN
HTHT
MLKN vs. HTHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) and Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLKN | HTHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | 1.36 | -1.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | 2.04 | -2.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.25 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 2.25 | -2.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 6.15 | -7.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLKN | HTHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 | 1.36 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | -0.00 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 | 0.41 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.41 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLKN and HTHT is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MLKN vs. HTHT - Dividend Comparison
MLKN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than HTHT's 3.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLKN MillerKnoll, Inc. | 5.19% | 4.10% | 3.32% | 2.81% | 3.57% | 1.91% | 1.18% | 1.96% | 2.50% | 1.75% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
HTHT Huazhu Group Limited | 3.54% | 3.78% | 1.91% | 2.78% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 2.18% |
Drawdowns
MLKN vs. HTHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLKN drawdown since its inception was -79.45%, which is greater than HTHT's maximum drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLKN and HTHT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLKN | HTHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.45% | -64.02% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.80% | -19.68% | -18.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.06% | -63.43% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.06% | -64.02% | -8.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.80% | -10.29% | -56.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -25.97% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.67% | 7.19% | +9.48% |
Volatility
MLKN vs. HTHT - Volatility Comparison
MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) has a higher volatility of 27.45% compared to Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT) at 9.30%. This indicates that MLKN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLKN | HTHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.45% | 9.30% | +18.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.20% | 20.85% | +15.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.16% | 32.03% | +16.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.27% | 50.13% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.36% | 48.92% | -4.56% |
Financials
MLKN vs. HTHT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MillerKnoll, Inc. and Huazhu Group Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MLKN vs. HTHT - Profitability Comparison
MLKN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported a gross profit of 352.90M and revenue of 926.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.
HTHT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported a gross profit of 2.57B and revenue of 6.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.
MLKN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported an operating income of 44.90M and revenue of 926.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
HTHT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported an operating income of 1.66B and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.
MLKN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported a net income of 67.90M and revenue of 926.60M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.
HTHT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported a net income of 1.16B and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.