MKL vs. XLF

In the year-to-date period, MKL achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 7.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MKL has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 9.54%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 14.40% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Markel Corporation (MKL) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MKL Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKL and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MKL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

The maximum MKL drawdown since its inception was -61.32%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKL and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Markel Corporation (MKL) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 5.17%. This indicates that MKL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.