MGWIX vs. PUDZX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Growth Allocation Fund (MGWIX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX).
MGWIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jun 27, 2002. PUDZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2010.
Performance
MGWIX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGWIX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGWIX MFS Growth Allocation Fund | -1.13% | 13.63% | 10.71% | 14.86% | -15.92% | 16.01% | 14.75% | 26.55% | -5.59% | 19.22% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 10.18% | 13.40% | 8.61% | 3.26% | -2.76% | 18.49% | 4.84% | 16.29% | -9.20% | 6.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGWIX achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 10.18% return. Over the past 10 years, MGWIX has outperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 9.22%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.01% annualized return.
MGWIX
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 11.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
PUDZX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGWIX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGWIX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGWIX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank
MGWIX
PUDZX
MGWIX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth Allocation Fund (MGWIX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGWIX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 2.04 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 2.65 | -1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.41 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.45 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 13.65 | -7.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGWIX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 2.04 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.87 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.52 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGWIX and PUDZX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGWIX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison
MGWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than PUDZX's 8.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGWIX MFS Growth Allocation Fund | 8.34% | 8.24% | 6.24% | 3.84% | 4.83% | 7.28% | 3.79% | 5.00% | 6.89% | 5.04% | 3.11% | 5.08% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 8.10% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 3.66% | 9.10% | 13.00% | 4.94% | 3.40% | 2.14% | 2.10% | 1.39% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
MGWIX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGWIX drawdown since its inception was -47.83%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGWIX and PUDZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGWIX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -21.53% | -26.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.31% | -8.20% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.39% | -17.98% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.09% | -21.53% | -7.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.42% | -1.59% | -3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -5.31% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.47% | +0.59% |
Volatility
MGWIX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Growth Allocation Fund (MGWIX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 2.71%. This indicates that MGWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGWIX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 2.71% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 6.29% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 9.72% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 10.59% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.83% | 9.70% | +3.13% |