MET vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MET or XLF.
Correlation
The correlation between MET and XLF is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MET vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MET:
0.25
XLF:
0.92
MET:
0.51
XLF:
1.37
MET:
1.08
XLF:
1.20
MET:
0.33
XLF:
1.20
MET:
1.12
XLF:
4.72
MET:
6.44%
XLF:
3.94%
MET:
29.31%
XLF:
20.15%
MET:
-82.93%
XLF:
-82.43%
MET:
-14.25%
XLF:
-7.66%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a -7.58% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 7.99%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.
MET
-7.58%
-10.41%
-7.51%
7.67%
21.83%
7.99%
XLF
-0.28%
-4.49%
3.80%
19.30%
19.43%
13.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MET vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MET
XLF
MET vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MET vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than XLF's 1.48% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.90% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.48% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
MET vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.93%, roughly equal to the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MET vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 19.02% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 13.51%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.