PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MC vs. AXP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MC vs. AXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Moelis & Company (MC) and American Express Company (AXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MC achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly higher than AXP's -18.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MC having a 17.89% annualized return and AXP not far ahead at 18.10%.


MC

1D
-3.08%
1M
8.79%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
4.95%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
24.25%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
17.89%

AXP

1D
-3.34%
1M
-5.84%
YTD
-18.32%
6M
-17.91%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*
18.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MC vs. AXP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MC
Moelis & Company
-0.39%-3.13%37.14%54.90%-35.18%49.03%62.83%0.80%-22.52%52.49%
AXP
American Express Company
-18.32%25.99%60.32%28.67%-8.52%36.88%-1.14%32.52%-2.62%36.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MC and AXP is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2014

0.51

The correlation between MC and AXP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MC:

$5.33B

AXP:

$206.19B

EPS

MC:

$2.79

AXP:

$16.23

PE Ratio

MC:

24.03

AXP:

18.52

PEG Ratio

MC:

1.38

AXP:

1.58

PS Ratio

MC:

3.47

AXP:

2.52

PB Ratio

MC:

10.95

AXP:

6.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

MC:

$1.53B

AXP:

$82.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MC:

$1.06B

AXP:

$68.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

MC:

$300.04M

AXP:

$18.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MC vs. AXP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MC
MC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

AXP
AXP Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXP Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MC vs. AXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moelis & Company (MC) and American Express Company (AXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCAXPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.04

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

0.09

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

0.20

+1.37

MC vs. AXP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the AXP Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MC and AXP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCAXPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.08

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.48

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.28

+0.17

Drawdowns

MC vs. AXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, smaller than the maximum AXP drawdown of -83.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC and AXP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCAXPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.26%

-83.91%

+25.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.26%

-23.90%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.31%

-28.76%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.06%

-31.55%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.26%

-49.64%

-8.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.21%

-21.49%

+9.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.32%

-22.05%

+1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.79%

10.77%

+3.02%

Volatility

MC vs. AXP - Volatility Comparison

Moelis & Company (MC) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to American Express Company (AXP) at 5.19%. This indicates that MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCAXPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

5.19%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.88%

19.75%

+6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.17%

26.01%

+8.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.64%

29.44%

+7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.92%

31.81%

+4.11%

Dividends

MC vs. AXP - Dividend Comparison

MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than AXP's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AXP
American Express Company
1.13%0.85%0.91%1.24%1.35%1.05%1.42%1.29%1.51%1.32%1.61%1.58%
MC
Moelis & Company
3.87%3.78%3.25%4.28%6.25%10.88%8.88%10.18%14.19%5.11%9.71%3.43%

Financials

MC vs. AXP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moelis & Company and American Express Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
319.78M
20.88B
(MC) Total Revenue
(AXP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MC vs. AXP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Moelis & Company and American Express Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
34.2%
84.6%
Portfolio components
MC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moelis & Company reported a gross profit of 109.37M and revenue of 319.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.

AXP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Express Company reported a gross profit of 17.66B and revenue of 20.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

MC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moelis & Company reported an operating income of 40.50M and revenue of 319.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

AXP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Express Company reported an operating income of 6.60B and revenue of 20.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

MC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moelis & Company reported a net income of 38.43M and revenue of 319.78M, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

AXP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Express Company reported a net income of 2.97B and revenue of 20.88B, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MC and AXP have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MC has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to AXP (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MC dropped -58.26% vs AXP's -83.91%.

MC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MC and AXP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer