PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBUU vs. BC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MBUU vs. BC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) and Brunswick Corporation (BC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBUU achieves a -6.45% return, which is significantly lower than BC's 9.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MBUU has underperformed BC with an annualized return of 6.65%, while BC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.22% annualized return.


MBUU

1D
-2.51%
1M
2.68%
YTD
-6.45%
6M
-7.60%
1Y
-15.36%
3Y*
-22.88%
5Y*
-18.97%
10Y*
6.65%

BC

1D
-2.47%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
9.46%
6M
16.07%
1Y
49.70%
3Y*
1.66%
5Y*
-1.69%
10Y*
7.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBUU vs. BC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBUU
Malibu Boats, Inc.
-6.45%-24.95%-31.43%2.85%-22.45%10.07%52.48%17.67%17.05%55.82%
BC
Brunswick Corporation
9.46%18.05%-31.75%36.90%-27.11%33.82%29.16%31.38%-14.77%2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MBUU and BC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2014

0.61

The correlation between MBUU and BC shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MBUU:

-$0.05

BC:

-$2.75

PS Ratio

MBUU:

0.61

BC:

0.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

MBUU:

$826.09M

BC:

$5.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MBUU:

$127.07M

BC:

$1.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

MBUU:

$7.24M

BC:

$190.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBUU vs. BC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBUU
MBUU Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MBUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBUU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MBUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBUU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BC
BC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBUU vs. BC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) and Brunswick Corporation (BC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBUUBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.23

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

2.23

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.63

5.75

-6.38

MBUU vs. BC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBUU Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the BC Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBUU and BC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBUUBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

1.25

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

-0.04

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.18

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.23

-0.16

Drawdowns

MBUU vs. BC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBUU drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, smaller than the maximum BC drawdown of -95.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBUU and BC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBUUBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.94%

-95.60%

+21.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.37%

-22.38%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.15%

-56.47%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.77%

-57.77%

-14.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.94%

-60.99%

-12.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.30%

-22.78%

-48.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.35%

-28.22%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.26%

8.67%

+15.59%

Volatility

MBUU vs. BC - Volatility Comparison

Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) has a higher volatility of 21.33% compared to Brunswick Corporation (BC) at 10.31%. This indicates that MBUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBUUBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.33%

10.31%

+11.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.32%

27.31%

+8.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.41%

39.81%

+12.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.95%

38.06%

+6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.95%

39.77%

+7.18%

Dividends

MBUU vs. BC - Dividend Comparison

MBUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BC
Brunswick Corporation
2.16%2.32%2.60%1.65%2.03%1.27%1.30%1.45%1.68%1.24%1.13%1.04%
MBUU
Malibu Boats, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MBUU vs. BC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Malibu Boats, Inc. and Brunswick Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
235.70M
1.38B
(MBUU) Total Revenue
(BC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MBUU vs. BC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Malibu Boats, Inc. and Brunswick Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
19.0%
0
Portfolio components
MBUU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Malibu Boats, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.70M and revenue of 235.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

BC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MBUU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Malibu Boats, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.91M and revenue of 235.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.8%.

BC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported an operating income of 50.30M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

MBUU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Malibu Boats, Inc. reported a net income of -2.44M and revenue of 235.70M, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.

BC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a net income of 21.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MBUU and BC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBUU has higher volatility (21.33%) compared to BC (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBUU dropped -73.94% vs BC's -95.60%.

BC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBUU and BC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer