MAXJ vs. HEGD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD).

MAXJ and HEGD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAXJ is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 28, 2024. HEGD is a passively managed fund by Swan that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 22, 2020.

Performance

MAXJ vs. HEGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAXJ vs. HEGD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAXJ iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF	0.14%	8.97%	4.55%
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF	-1.73%	12.95%	5.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAXJ achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than HEGD's -1.73% return.

MAXJ

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 0.14%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 10.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HEGD

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -2.38%
• YTD: -1.73%
• 6M: -0.47%
• 1Y: 13.14%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 7.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAXJ vs. HEGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAXJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HEGD's 0.88% expense ratio.

HEGD

Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF

MAXJ

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

Return for Risk

MAXJ vs. HEGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAXJ

MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 90
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 92

HEGD

HEGD Risk / Return Rank: 86
HEGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
HEGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HEGD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
HEGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HEGD Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAXJ vs. HEGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAXJ	HEGD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.65	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.47	+0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.31	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	3.08	-0.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.87	11.89	+1.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAXJ vs. HEGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the HEGD Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAXJ and HEGD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAXJ	HEGD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	1.65	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.91	+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between MAXJ and HEGD is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MAXJ vs. HEGD - Dividend Comparison

MAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than HEGD's 0.36% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MAXJ iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF	1.01%	1.01%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.43%	0.39%	0.87%	0.31%

Drawdowns

MAXJ vs. HEGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAXJ drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum HEGD drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXJ and HEGD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAXJ	HEGD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.35%	-14.56%	+8.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.88%	-4.39%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-3.15%	+2.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-3.76%	+3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	1.14%	-0.38%

Volatility

MAXJ vs. HEGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) is 1.32%, while Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that MAXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAXJ	HEGD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	2.21%	-0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.95%	4.93%	-2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.67%	8.00%	-2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.50%	9.41%	-3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.50%	9.40%	-3.90%