PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MASKX vs. SC0C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

MASKX vs. SC0C.DE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE).

MASKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 9, 1997. SC0C.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600. It was launched on Apr 1, 2009.

Performance

MASKX vs. SC0C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MASKX vs. SC0C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MASKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund		-2.51%12.76%11.35%16.99%-20.39%14.54%19.99%25.54%-11.03%14.61%
SC0C.DE
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF		-2.55%36.22%2.12%19.19%-15.45%14.69%7.60%25.61%-15.39%26.52%
Different Trading Currencies

MASKX is traded in USD, while SC0C.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SC0C.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MASKX having a -2.51% return and SC0C.DE slightly lower at -2.55%. Over the past 10 years, MASKX has outperformed SC0C.DE with an annualized return of 9.43%, while SC0C.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.81% annualized return.

MASKX

1D
-1.48%
1M
-8.19%
YTD
-2.51%
6M
-0.38%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
11.69%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
9.43%

SC0C.DE

1D
1.36%
1M
-9.44%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
3.93%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund

Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF

Often compared with MASKX:
MASKX vs. VRTIXMASKX vs. EXTRMASKX vs. VOOMASKX vs. FSSNXMASKX vs. ^GSPCMASKX vs. VDCMASKX vs. VB
Often compared with SC0C.DE:
SC0C.DE vs. S600.LSC0C.DE vs. V50A.DESC0C.DE vs. SPYSC0C.DE vs. SPY5.DESC0C.DE vs. CHDVD.SWSC0C.DE vs. EQQQ.LSC0C.DE vs. RTYS.L

MASKX vs. SC0C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MASKX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SC0C.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

SC0C.DE
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
MASKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund

Return for Risk

MASKX vs. SC0C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MASKX
MASKX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MASKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MASKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE
SC0C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SC0C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MASKX vs. SC0C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MASKXSC0C.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

1.16

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.59

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.64

-0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.00

6.17

-1.17

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MASKX vs. SC0C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the SC0C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASKX and SC0C.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MASKXSC0C.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.16

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.49

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.49

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.47

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between MASKX and SC0C.DE is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MASKX vs. SC0C.DE - Dividend Comparison

MASKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while SC0C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MASKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund		3.22%3.13%4.81%2.92%1.70%7.64%1.42%3.43%4.26%3.15%4.60%3.63%
SC0C.DE
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MASKX vs. SC0C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASKX drawdown since its inception was -59.06%, which is greater than SC0C.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASKX and SC0C.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

MASKXSC0C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.06%

-35.89%

-23.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-12.93%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.98%

-20.52%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.68%

-35.89%

-5.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.01%

-7.54%

-3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.69%

-5.35%

-6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

2.87%

+0.81%

Volatility

MASKX vs. SC0C.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (SC0C.DE) have volatilities of 6.63% and 6.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

MASKXSC0C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

6.48%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

10.11%

+3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.10%

17.33%

+5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.14%

17.44%

+5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

18.03%

+5.60%