PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MA.NEO vs. VUAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MA.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mastercard Inc CDR (MA.NEO) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MA.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MA.NEO
Mastercard Inc CDR
-13.78%6.43%22.59%22.17%-4.59%17.36%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
-2.96%12.22%35.96%23.20%-12.82%2.04%
Different Trading Currencies

MA.NEO is traded in CAD, while VUAG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUAG.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MA.NEO achieves a -13.78% return, which is significantly lower than VUAG.L's 28.89% return.


MA.NEO

1D
-1.44%
1M
-5.91%
YTD
-13.78%
6M
-15.24%
1Y
-11.40%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
10Y*

VUAG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
30.85%
YTD
28.89%
6M
30.28%
1Y
52.02%
3Y*
31.51%
5Y*
20.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MA.NEO vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MA.NEO
MA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MA.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Inc CDR (MA.NEO) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MA.NEOVUAG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.46

1.32

-1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.49

4.06

-4.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.60

-0.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

7.59

-8.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.38

28.10

-29.48

MA.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MA.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MA.NEO and VUAG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MA.NEOVUAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

1.32

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.97

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between MA.NEO and VUAG.L is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MA.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison

MA.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while VUAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
MA.NEO
Mastercard Inc CDR
0.89%0.76%0.69%0.72%0.74%0.00%0.00%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.39%

Drawdowns

MA.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -28.75%, which is greater than VUAG.L's maximum drawdown of -27.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA.NEO and VUAG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MA.NEOVUAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.75%

-25.61%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.00%

-24.47%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.40%

-24.47%

+6.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-3.58%

-3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.36%

2.48%

+5.88%

Volatility

MA.NEO vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mastercard Inc CDR (MA.NEO) is 7.03%, while Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) has a volatility of 30.89%. This indicates that MA.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MA.NEOVUAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

30.89%

-23.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.47%

31.64%

-15.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.66%

39.16%

-14.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.38%

21.37%

+2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.38%

38.80%

-15.42%