LYY4.DE vs. XMK9.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE).

LYY4.DE and XMK9.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LYY4.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the TOPIX®. It was launched on Sep 19, 2018. XMK9.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan. It was launched on Sep 1, 2007. Both LYY4.DE and XMK9.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LYY4.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LYY4.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LYY4.DE Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist	7.12%	13.10%	12.42%	14.70%	-10.26%	8.20%	3.15%	20.97%	-11.07%	10.82%
XMK9.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged	7.07%	27.06%	22.49%	33.31%	-6.05%	11.97%	7.34%	17.42%	-16.83%	18.79%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LYY4.DE having a 7.12% return and XMK9.DE slightly lower at 7.07%. Over the past 10 years, LYY4.DE has underperformed XMK9.DE with an annualized return of 8.52%, while XMK9.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.

LYY4.DE

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 7.12%
• 6M: 11.94%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 14.23%
• 5Y*: 7.30%
• 10Y*: 8.52%

XMK9.DE

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 20.05%
• 1Y: 39.89%
• 3Y*: 26.92%
• 5Y*: 16.43%
• 10Y*: 12.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYY4.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYY4.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XMK9.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

LYY4.DE

Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist

XMK9.DE

Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged

Return for Risk

LYY4.DE vs. XMK9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYY4.DE

LYY4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 64
LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
LYY4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
LYY4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 63
LYY4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LYY4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

XMK9.DE

XMK9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 89
XMK9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XMK9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XMK9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
XMK9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
XMK9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYY4.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYY4.DE	XMK9.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.78	-0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.40	-0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	5.13	-2.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	18.23	-11.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYY4.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the XMK9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYY4.DE and XMK9.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYY4.DE	XMK9.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.78	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.87	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.68	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.66	-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between LYY4.DE and XMK9.DE is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LYY4.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYY4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while XMK9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LYY4.DE Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist	0.66%	0.71%	0.74%	1.24%	1.88%	1.34%	1.14%	1.94%	1.86%	1.44%	1.98%	1.80%
XMK9.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LYY4.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYY4.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.07%, which is greater than XMK9.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYY4.DE and XMK9.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYY4.DE	XMK9.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.07%	-34.29%	-19.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-9.72%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.34%	-21.74%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.62%	-34.29%	+5.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.89%	-6.31%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.40%	-7.78%	-6.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	2.73%	+0.44%

Volatility

LYY4.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE) have volatilities of 8.35% and 8.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYY4.DE	XMK9.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.35%	8.75%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.10%	15.58%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.76%	22.36%	-2.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.15%	18.61%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.39%	19.03%	-2.64%