LVWC.DE vs. MBZ3.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF (LVWC.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Mercedes Benz (MBG) ETP Securities (MBZ3.DE).

LVWC.DE and MBZ3.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LVWC.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Leveraged 2x Daily Net Index. It was launched on Sep 30, 2025. MBZ3.DE is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX 3x Leveraged MBG Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2022. Both LVWC.DE and MBZ3.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LVWC.DE vs. MBZ3.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF (LVWC.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Mercedes Benz (MBG) ETP Securities (MBZ3.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LVWC.DE vs. MBZ3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LVWC.DE Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF	-5.88%	2.68%
MBZ3.DE Leverage Shares 3x Long Mercedes Benz (MBG) ETP Securities	-37.09%	34.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVWC.DE achieves a -5.88% return, which is significantly higher than MBZ3.DE's -37.09% return.

LVWC.DE

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -4.92%
• YTD: -5.88%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MBZ3.DE

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -20.59%
• YTD: -37.09%
• 6M: -20.64%
• 1Y: -17.91%
• 3Y*: -36.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVWC.DE vs. MBZ3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVWC.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MBZ3.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.

MBZ3.DE

Leverage Shares 3x Long Mercedes Benz (MBG) ETP Securities

LVWC.DE

Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

LVWC.DE vs. MBZ3.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBZ3.DE

MBZ3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8
MBZ3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
MBZ3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
MBZ3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 12
MBZ3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MBZ3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVWC.DE vs. MBZ3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF (LVWC.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Mercedes Benz (MBG) ETP Securities (MBZ3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LVWC.DE	MBZ3.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.29	-0.33	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between LVWC.DE and MBZ3.DE is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LVWC.DE vs. MBZ3.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LVWC.DE nor MBZ3.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LVWC.DE vs. MBZ3.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVWC.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, smaller than the maximum MBZ3.DE drawdown of -86.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVWC.DE and MBZ3.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LVWC.DE	MBZ3.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.47%	-86.65%	+72.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.72%	-82.34%	+72.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-50.66%	+47.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	18.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LVWC.DE	MBZ3.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	49.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.04%	76.21%	-52.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.04%	73.05%	-49.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.04%	73.05%	-49.01%