PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 8.04%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.


LVHD

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
7.25%
6M
7.40%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
8.04%

VTI

1D
0.47%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHD vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
7.25%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.72%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and VTI is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2015

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between LVHD and VTI has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LVHD vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHD
VTI

Utilities

25.5%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

18.5%
4.7%

Real Estate

15.0%
2.4%

Financial Services

8.6%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
10.0%

Energy

6.7%
3.7%

Technology

5.9%
33.5%

Industrials

4.6%
9.8%

Healthcare

4.6%
9.2%

Communication Services

3.8%
10.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Utilities

LVHD
25.5%
VTI
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

LVHD
18.5%
VTI
4.7%

Real Estate

LVHD
15.0%
VTI
2.4%

Financial Services

LVHD
8.6%
VTI
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHD
6.8%
VTI
10.0%

Energy

LVHD
6.7%
VTI
3.7%

Technology

LVHD
5.9%
VTI
33.5%

Industrials

LVHD
4.6%
VTI
9.8%

Healthcare

LVHD
4.6%
VTI
9.2%

Communication Services

LVHD
3.8%
VTI
10.3%

Basic Materials

LVHD

-

VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHD vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVHDVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

3.24

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

14.94

-10.46

LVHD vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVHDVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.38

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.74

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.82

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.51

+0.06

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-55.45%

+18.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-8.92%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-19.30%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-25.36%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-35.00%

-2.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-0.26%

-4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-8.03%

+3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

1.93%

+0.50%

Volatility

LVHD vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 2.89% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.90%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

9.13%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

12.17%

-2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

17.40%

-4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

18.30%

-2.80%

LVHD vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LVHD vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.39%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and VTI have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to LVHD (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.04% vs 8.04% for LVHD. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

LVHD is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer