LSTR vs. EXPD
LSTR (Landstar System, Inc.) and EXPD (Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, LSTR returned 13.96%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for EXPD. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LSTR vs. EXPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSTR achieves a 47.08% return, which is significantly higher than EXPD's 8.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LSTR having a 13.96% annualized return and EXPD not far ahead at 14.40%.
LSTR
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 47.08%
- 6M
- 45.89%
- 1Y
- 52.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
EXPD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 42.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
LSTR vs. EXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSTR Landstar System, Inc. | 47.08% | -14.42% | -9.66% | 21.17% | -7.32% | 35.59% | 21.19% | 19.77% | -6.24% | 22.57% |
EXPD Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. | 8.83% | 36.16% | -11.86% | 23.86% | -21.68% | 42.50% | 23.47% | 16.17% | 6.52% | 23.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSTR and EXPD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 1993 | 0.40 |
The correlation between LSTR and EXPD shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LSTR:
$7.06B
EXPD:
$21.63B
LSTR:
$3.62
EXPD:
$6.16
LSTR:
57.30
EXPD:
26.18
LSTR:
1.50
EXPD:
1.96
LSTR:
8.84
EXPD:
9.47
LSTR:
$4.77B
EXPD:
$11.19B
LSTR:
$821.79M
EXPD:
$1.29B
LSTR:
$236.93M
EXPD:
$1.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSTR vs. EXPD — Risk / Return Rank
LSTR
EXPD
LSTR vs. EXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Landstar System, Inc. (LSTR) and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSTR | EXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.69 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 6.80 | -0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSTR vs. EXPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSTR drawdown since its inception was -53.20%, smaller than the maximum EXPD drawdown of -58.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSTR and EXPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSTR | EXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.20% | -58.07% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.40% | -15.88% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.75% | -21.26% | -17.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.75% | -35.62% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.75% | -35.62% | -3.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.93% | -3.17% | -4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.93% | -13.62% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.15% | 6.27% | +1.88% |
Volatility
LSTR vs. EXPD - Volatility Comparison
Landstar System, Inc. (LSTR) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) at 5.77%. This indicates that LSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSTR | EXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 5.77% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.54% | 24.27% | +4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.92% | 30.55% | +4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.76% | 26.80% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.45% | 25.10% | +2.35% |
Dividends
LSTR vs. EXPD - Dividend Comparison
LSTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than EXPD's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXPD Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. | 0.98% | 1.03% | 1.32% | 1.08% | 1.29% | 0.86% | 1.09% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.60% |
LSTR Landstar System, Inc. | 1.73% | 2.48% | 1.97% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.63% | 2.07% | 0.61% | 2.23% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 2.22% |
Financials
LSTR vs. EXPD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Landstar System, Inc. and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LSTR vs. EXPD - Profitability Comparison
LSTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Landstar System, Inc. reported a gross profit of 264.29M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.6%.
EXPD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LSTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Landstar System, Inc. reported an operating income of 53.24M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.
EXPD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. reported an operating income of 294.83M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
LSTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Landstar System, Inc. reported a net income of 39.44M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
EXPD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. reported a net income of 229.61M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LSTR and EXPD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSTR has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to EXPD (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSTR dropped -53.20% vs EXPD's -58.07%.
LSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSTR and EXPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer