PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQTI vs. QYLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LQTI vs. QYLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LQTI vs. QYLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


LQTI

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQTI vs. QYLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLE's 0.61% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LQTI vs. QYLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQTI vs. QYLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQTIQYLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.15

LQTI vs. QYLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQTIQYLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

Dividends

LQTI vs. QYLE - Dividend Comparison

LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%, while QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

LQTI vs. QYLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQTI drawdown since its inception was -3.41%, which is greater than QYLE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQTI and QYLE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LQTIQYLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

0.00%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

0.00%

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

0.00%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

Volatility

LQTI vs. QYLE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LQTIQYLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23%

0.00%

+6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.11%

0.00%

+6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.11%

0.00%

+6.11%