PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQDS.L vs. TCBT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LQDS.L vs. TCBT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LQDS.L) and VanEck iBoxx EUR Corporates UCITS ETF (TCBT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LQDS.L vs. TCBT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LQDS.L
iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.57%0.56%2.80%3.05%-7.97%-0.39%6.90%14.25%-1.55%
TCBT.DE
VanEck iBoxx EUR Corporates UCITS ETF
-0.30%7.75%-1.15%6.07%-8.75%-8.24%8.06%1.43%-0.42%
Different Trading Currencies

LQDS.L is traded in GBp, while TCBT.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the TCBT.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDS.L achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than TCBT.DE's -0.30% return.


LQDS.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
0.57%
6M
1.43%
1Y
1.82%
3Y*
2.01%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*

TCBT.DE

1D
0.55%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQDS.L vs. TCBT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TCBT.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LQDS.L vs. TCBT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDS.L
LQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

TCBT.DE
TCBT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TCBT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCBT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCBT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TCBT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCBT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDS.L vs. TCBT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LQDS.L) and VanEck iBoxx EUR Corporates UCITS ETF (TCBT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQDS.LTCBT.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

1.11

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.35

1.66

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.21

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

1.64

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.72

4.63

-3.91

LQDS.L vs. TCBT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the TCBT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDS.L and TCBT.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQDS.LTCBT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.11

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.01

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.06

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between LQDS.L and TCBT.DE is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LQDS.L vs. TCBT.DE - Dividend Comparison

LQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than TCBT.DE's 3.13% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LQDS.L
iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.92%4.92%4.91%4.66%3.68%2.63%2.95%3.51%3.57%3.39%1.64%
TCBT.DE
VanEck iBoxx EUR Corporates UCITS ETF
3.13%2.45%2.39%1.12%1.39%0.75%1.00%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LQDS.L vs. TCBT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDS.L drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, smaller than the maximum TCBT.DE drawdown of -21.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDS.L and TCBT.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDS.LTCBT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-16.90%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-3.39%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.27%

-16.88%

+1.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.19%

-3.02%

-5.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.63%

-5.17%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

0.84%

+2.16%

Volatility

LQDS.L vs. TCBT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LQDS.L) is 2.24%, while VanEck iBoxx EUR Corporates UCITS ETF (TCBT.DE) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that LQDS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCBT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LQDS.LTCBT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

2.58%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

4.31%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

6.05%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.51%

6.65%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.16%

7.14%

+3.02%