LNTH vs. SPY
Compare and contrast key facts about Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LNTH or SPY.
Correlation
The correlation between LNTH and SPY is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
LNTH vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LNTH:
1.07
SPY:
0.37
LNTH:
2.09
SPY:
0.68
LNTH:
1.29
SPY:
1.10
LNTH:
1.69
SPY:
0.38
LNTH:
3.60
SPY:
1.90
LNTH:
18.80%
SPY:
3.74%
LNTH:
62.94%
SPY:
19.03%
LNTH:
-78.62%
SPY:
-55.19%
LNTH:
-18.98%
SPY:
-10.22%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNTH achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's -6.11% return.
LNTH
11.96%
-8.95%
-8.34%
65.77%
50.15%
N/A
SPY
-6.11%
-1.84%
-4.33%
6.99%
16.28%
12.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LNTH vs. SPY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LNTH
SPY
LNTH vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LNTH vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
LNTH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNTH Lantheus Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.31% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
LNTH vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNTH drawdown since its inception was -78.62%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNTH and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LNTH vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 13.56% and 13.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with LNTH or SPY
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Discrepancy between SPY and ^GSPC?
Hello, from the charts, SPY seems to be outperforming its benchmark ^GSPC. That looks strange. From my understanding, SPY is designed to closely track the S&P 500.
Could there be an error in the charts?
Hedge Cat
Transactional Portfolio Use
I am trying to understand how to make the best use of transactional portfolios. At first I thought it is useful when tracking the performance of a self-managed fund. You add cash to it, transact in equities, adding each transaction to the portfolio. It then shows you its performance wrt. to a benchmark. The broker does this for you anyway, but the whole reason I started evaluating Portfolioslab is so that I can separate my single broker account into thematic baskets ("thematic funds") and track their performance individually.
The transactional portfolio in Portfolioslab does not seem to work that way. It does not consider the changes in cash position, ie. any profit/loss made on equity transactions. It does not seem to be suited for track the assets of a fund, so to speak. What good is transactional portfolio then?
EG