PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LNG vs. MAR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LNGMAR
YTD Return-7.47%4.03%
1Y Return9.58%34.01%
3Y Return (Ann)26.70%17.37%
5Y Return (Ann)20.20%11.57%
10Y Return (Ann)11.16%16.15%
Sharpe Ratio0.511.51
Daily Std Dev21.48%21.61%
Max Drawdown-98.89%-88.22%
Current Drawdown-13.28%-9.27%

Fundamentals


LNGMAR
Market Cap$36.34B$67.00B
EPS$40.72$9.69
PE Ratio3.8724.21
PEG Ratio0.602.53
Revenue (TTM)$19.78B$6.38B
Gross Profit (TTM)$5.98B$4.28B
EBITDA (TTM)$16.71B$4.20B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between LNG and MAR is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LNG vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 11.16%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 16.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%1,100.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
573.60%
1,026.57%
LNG
MAR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cheniere Energy, Inc.

Marriott International, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNG vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LNG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNG, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.51
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNG, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNG, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.43
MAR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MAR, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.51
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MAR, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MAR, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MAR, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MAR, currently valued at 8.27, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.008.27

LNG vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LNG and MAR.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.51
1.51
LNG
MAR

Dividends

LNG vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than MAR's 0.89% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
1.05%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.89%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%0.99%1.30%

Drawdowns

LNG vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -88.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and MAR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.28%
-9.27%
LNG
MAR

Volatility

LNG vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) have volatilities of 6.20% and 6.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.20%
6.18%
LNG
MAR

Financials

LNG vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items