LMVTX vs. LCSSX
LMVTX (ClearBridge Value Trust) and LCSSX (ClearBridge Select Fund) are both mutual funds - LMVTX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Legg Mason, while LCSSX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, LMVTX returned 11.59%/yr vs 16.95%/yr for LCSSX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMVTX charges 1.74%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LCSSX.
Performance
LMVTX vs. LCSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMVTX achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly higher than LCSSX's 3.46% return. Over the past 10 years, LMVTX has underperformed LCSSX with an annualized return of 11.59%, while LCSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
LMVTX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
LCSSX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
LMVTX vs. LCSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMVTX ClearBridge Value Trust | 11.13% | 9.80% | 14.22% | 18.80% | -7.00% | 26.93% | 10.63% | 26.25% | -13.50% | 13.76% |
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund | 3.46% | 7.26% | 21.54% | 24.25% | -33.06% | 20.27% | 58.86% | 33.60% | 10.56% | 39.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMVTX and LCSSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2012 | 0.77 |
The correlation between LMVTX and LCSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMVTX vs. LCSSX — Risk / Return Rank
LMVTX
LCSSX
LMVTX vs. LCSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Value Trust (LMVTX) and ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMVTX | LCSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.15 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 0.93 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.63 | 2.85 | +7.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMVTX vs. LCSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMVTX drawdown since its inception was -72.54%, which is greater than LCSSX's maximum drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMVTX and LCSSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMVTX | LCSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.54% | -43.46% | -29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -14.24% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -23.67% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.79% | -43.46% | +22.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.47% | -43.46% | +2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -2.11% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -9.17% | -2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 4.63% | -2.55% |
Volatility
LMVTX vs. LCSSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Value Trust (LMVTX) is 3.94%, while ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that LMVTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMVTX | LCSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 5.13% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 11.95% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 15.14% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 21.82% | -4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 21.94% | -2.71% |
LMVTX vs. LCSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMVTX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSSX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMVTX vs. LCSSX - Dividend Comparison
LMVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, while LCSSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 3.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.28% | 2.11% | 1.12% | 5.25% |
LMVTX ClearBridge Value Trust | 9.30% | 10.33% | 10.32% | 12.03% | 7.85% | 18.06% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMVTX and LCSSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCSSX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to LMVTX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMVTX dropped -72.54% vs LCSSX's -43.46%.
LMVTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMVTX and LCSSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer