PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LISDX vs. FMBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LISDX vs. FMBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LISDX vs. FMBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LISDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund
-0.12%4.44%3.11%3.14%-4.38%0.55%2.18%1.39%
FMBIX
Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund
0.00%0.60%1.32%5.89%-10.00%1.14%3.10%1.48%

Returns By Period


LISDX

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
0.51%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
3.13%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
1.51%

FMBIX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LISDX vs. FMBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LISDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBIX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LISDX vs. FMBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LISDX
LISDX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LISDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LISDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LISDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LISDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LISDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FMBIX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LISDX vs. FMBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund (LISDX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LISDXFMBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.57

LISDX vs. FMBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LISDXFMBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

Correlation

The correlation between LISDX and FMBIX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LISDX vs. FMBIX - Dividend Comparison

LISDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, while FMBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LISDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Tax Free Fund
3.04%3.53%3.06%2.34%1.12%1.05%1.58%2.15%1.74%1.31%1.29%1.22%
FMBIX
Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund
0.00%0.70%2.60%2.29%1.17%1.28%1.59%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LISDX vs. FMBIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LISDXFMBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

Volatility

LISDX vs. FMBIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LISDXFMBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.75%