LGILX vs. VTI

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LGILX having a 24.41% return and VTI slightly higher at 24.89%. Over the past 10 years, LGILX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 4.70%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LGILX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LGILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGILX and VTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LGILX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.

The maximum LGILX drawdown since its inception was -54.56%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGILX and VTI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.00%. This indicates that LGILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.