LGEN.L vs. BATS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Legal & General Group plc (LGEN.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LGEN.L or BATS.L.
Key characteristics
| LGEN.L | BATS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.60% | 31.17% |
| 1Y Return | 6.92% | 16.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.19% | 11.21% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.28% | 7.74% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.15% | 3.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.25 | 0.76 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.86% | 20.21% |
| Max Drawdown | -85.42% | -64.53% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.55% | -15.86% |
Fundamentals
| LGEN.L | BATS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | £13.34B | £63.36B |
| EPS | £0.05 | -£6.22 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 3.15 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | £51.35B | £39.27B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | £51.35B | £27.63B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -£552.00M | £19.08B |
Correlation
The correlation between LGEN.L and BATS.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LGEN.L vs. BATS.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LGEN.L achieves a -3.60% return, which is significantly lower than BATS.L's 31.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LGEN.L has outperformed BATS.L with an annualized return of 6.15%, while BATS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.75% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LGEN.L vs. BATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legal & General Group plc (LGEN.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LGEN.L vs. BATS.L - Dividend Comparison
LGEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than BATS.L's 8.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGEN.L Legal & General Group plc | 9.30% | 7.82% | 7.50% | 5.99% | 6.60% | 5.53% | 6.77% | 5.36% | 5.63% | 4.41% | 3.94% | 3.63% |
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 8.13% | 10.06% | 6.64% | 7.89% | 7.77% | 6.28% | 7.81% | 4.35% | 3.37% | 3.98% | 4.14% | 4.25% |
Drawdowns
LGEN.L vs. BATS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGEN.L drawdown since its inception was -85.42%, which is greater than BATS.L's maximum drawdown of -64.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGEN.L and BATS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LGEN.L vs. BATS.L - Volatility Comparison
Legal & General Group plc (LGEN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) at 4.37%. This indicates that LGEN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LGEN.L vs. BATS.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Legal & General Group plc and British American Tobacco plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities