LCFYX vs. HICSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) and Harbor Convertible Securities Fund (HICSX).
LCFYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jun 29, 2003. HICSX is managed by Harbor. It was launched on May 1, 2011.
Performance
LCFYX vs. HICSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCFYX vs. HICSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCFYX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund | 1.76% | 22.27% | 13.91% | 7.25% | -23.24% | 1.34% | 64.36% | 24.25% | -5.76% | 16.78% |
HICSX Harbor Convertible Securities Fund | 0.67% | 19.99% | 12.36% | 10.37% | -15.55% | 2.07% | 31.41% | 17.89% | -0.65% | 7.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCFYX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than HICSX's 0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, LCFYX has outperformed HICSX with an annualized return of 11.72%, while HICSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.54% annualized return.
LCFYX
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
HICSX
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCFYX vs. HICSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCFYX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than HICSX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCFYX vs. HICSX — Risk / Return Rank
LCFYX
HICSX
LCFYX vs. HICSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) and Harbor Convertible Securities Fund (HICSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCFYX | HICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 1.62 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.45 | 2.22 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 3.07 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.50 | 12.11 | +0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCFYX | HICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 1.62 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.45 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.81 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.74 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCFYX and HICSX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LCFYX vs. HICSX - Dividend Comparison
LCFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than HICSX's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCFYX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund | 1.53% | 1.88% | 2.31% | 2.06% | 2.73% | 18.40% | 16.22% | 8.76% | 4.99% | 2.54% | 3.72% | 3.48% |
HICSX Harbor Convertible Securities Fund | 1.58% | 1.95% | 3.22% | 2.91% | 0.44% | 14.09% | 9.57% | 3.61% | 6.45% | 10.65% | 0.98% | 3.95% |
Drawdowns
LCFYX vs. HICSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCFYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than HICSX's maximum drawdown of -23.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCFYX and HICSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCFYX | HICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -23.68% | -15.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.06% | -6.92% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -22.03% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.42% | -23.68% | -9.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -6.92% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -4.82% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.75% | +0.21% |
Volatility
LCFYX vs. HICSX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) and Harbor Convertible Securities Fund (HICSX) have volatilities of 5.99% and 6.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCFYX | HICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 6.02% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 11.54% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 14.15% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.85% | 11.02% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 10.61% | +2.88% |