PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBWIX vs. FLCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBWIX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund (LBWIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBWIX achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly lower than FLCOX's 15.41% return.


LBWIX

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.45%
YTD
12.11%
6M
10.68%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
12.62%

FLCOX

1D
-1.08%
1M
2.31%
YTD
15.41%
6M
14.20%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBWIX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBWIX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund
12.11%17.38%18.59%7.42%-1.56%29.74%-1.41%25.66%-9.05%17.79%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
15.41%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between LBWIX and FLCOX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.96

The correlation between LBWIX and FLCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBWIX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBWIX
LBWIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LBWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LBWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBWIX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund (LBWIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LBWIXFLCOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

4.19

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.25

17.44

-3.19

LBWIX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBWIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBWIX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBWIX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBWIX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCOX drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBWIX and FLCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBWIXFLCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

-38.28%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-6.80%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

-15.60%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-19.00%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-1.16%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-4.43%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.63%

+0.28%

Volatility

LBWIX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund (LBWIX) is 3.29%, while Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that LBWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBWIXFLCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

4.17%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

8.73%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

11.31%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

14.87%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

17.63%

+0.18%

LBWIX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBWIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBWIX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

LBWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.11%, more than FLCOX's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.31%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%0.00%0.00%
LBWIX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund
11.11%12.45%11.18%1.90%13.87%16.48%2.89%11.13%11.30%6.47%6.95%6.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, LBWIX and FLCOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCOX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to LBWIX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBWIX dropped -38.22% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBWIX and FLCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer