PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAAA.DE vs. CLOD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LAAA.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fair Oaks AAA CLO Fund UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LAAA.DE) and Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LAAA.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAAA.DE achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than CLOD.DE's 0.61% return.


LAAA.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
0.37%
6M
1.09%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLOD.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.52%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LAAA.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAAA.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOD.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LAAA.DE vs. CLOD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAAA.DE
LAAA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LAAA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAAA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAAA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LAAA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAAA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOD.DE
CLOD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CLOD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAAA.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Oaks AAA CLO Fund UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LAAA.DE) and Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAAA.DECLOD.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.63

1.76

+1.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.50

2.31

+4.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.12

1.45

+0.67

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.79

3.08

+2.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.92

11.26

+11.66

LAAA.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAAA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is higher than the CLOD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAAA.DE and CLOD.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAAA.DECLOD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63

1.76

+1.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

1.59

+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between LAAA.DE and CLOD.DE is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LAAA.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Dividend Comparison

LAAA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than CLOD.DE's 2.56% yield.


Drawdowns

LAAA.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAAA.DE drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, which is greater than CLOD.DE's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAAA.DE and CLOD.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LAAA.DECLOD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-0.76%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.52%

-0.76%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.10%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.07%

-0.16%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

0.21%

-0.08%

Volatility

LAAA.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fair Oaks AAA CLO Fund UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LAAA.DE) is 0.18%, while Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) has a volatility of 0.38%. This indicates that LAAA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LAAA.DECLOD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

0.38%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.42%

0.98%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83%

1.33%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.62%

1.30%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.62%

1.30%

+0.32%