PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KWE3.L vs. SPYY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KWE3.L vs. SPYY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) and IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP (SPYY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KWE3.L vs. SPYY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KWE3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities
-48.88%11.50%29.53%
SPYY.L
IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP
-13.97%16.00%-4.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWE3.L achieves a -48.88% return, which is significantly lower than SPYY.L's -13.97% return.


KWE3.L

1D
4.80%
1M
-21.55%
YTD
-48.88%
6M
-71.40%
1Y
-61.53%
3Y*
-42.77%
5Y*
10Y*

SPYY.L

1D
-3.58%
1M
-6.79%
YTD
-13.97%
6M
-10.44%
1Y
1.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KWE3.L vs. SPYY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWE3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KWE3.L vs. SPYY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWE3.L
KWE3.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYY.L
SPYY.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SPYY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWE3.L vs. SPYY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) and IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP (SPYY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KWE3.LSPYY.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.71

0.11

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.93

0.23

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.04

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

0.08

-0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.73

0.32

-2.05

KWE3.L vs. SPYY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the SPYY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWE3.L and SPYY.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KWE3.LSPYY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

0.11

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

-0.21

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between KWE3.L and SPYY.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KWE3.L vs. SPYY.L - Dividend Comparison

KWE3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.45%.


Drawdowns

KWE3.L vs. SPYY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWE3.L drawdown since its inception was -98.42%, which is greater than SPYY.L's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWE3.L and SPYY.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KWE3.LSPYY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.42%

-17.71%

-80.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.02%

-14.91%

-59.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.34%

-14.91%

-83.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.05%

-4.46%

-85.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.93%

3.57%

+31.36%

Volatility

KWE3.L vs. SPYY.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) has a higher volatility of 26.88% compared to IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP (SPYY.L) at 5.01%. This indicates that KWE3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KWE3.LSPYY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.88%

5.01%

+21.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.44%

9.12%

+44.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.04%

15.02%

+71.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

137.43%

14.65%

+122.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

137.43%

14.65%

+122.78%