KTN.DE vs. GFT.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Kontron AG (KTN.DE) and GFT Technologies SE (GFT.DE).
Performance
KTN.DE vs. GFT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KTN.DE vs. GFT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTN.DE Kontron AG | -15.66% | 20.14% | -7.06% | 48.05% | 8.87% | -22.95% | -9.30% | 35.68% | -11.52% | 108.26% |
GFT.DE GFT Technologies SE | -3.38% | -12.46% | -27.79% | -6.65% | -25.86% | 290.19% | 4.55% | 81.08% | -47.44% | -35.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KTN.DE achieves a -15.66% return, which is significantly lower than GFT.DE's -3.38% return. Over the past 10 years, KTN.DE has outperformed GFT.DE with an annualized return of 13.45%, while GFT.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.13% annualized return.
KTN.DE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -13.30%
- YTD
- -15.66%
- 6M
- -28.99%
- 1Y
- -12.13%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
GFT.DE
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 21.35%
- YTD
- -3.38%
- 6M
- 3.16%
- 1Y
- -17.11%
- 3Y*
- -19.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.47%
- 10Y*
- 0.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KTN.DE vs. GFT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
KTN.DE
GFT.DE
KTN.DE vs. GFT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kontron AG (KTN.DE) and GFT Technologies SE (GFT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KTN.DE | GFT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | -0.37 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | -0.23 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.97 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | -0.41 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | -0.72 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KTN.DE | GFT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | -0.37 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.10 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.00 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.02 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between KTN.DE and GFT.DE is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KTN.DE vs. GFT.DE - Dividend Comparison
KTN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than GFT.DE's 2.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTN.DE Kontron AG | 3.12% | 2.63% | 2.57% | 4.65% | 4.58% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 0.82% | 0.56% | 0.92% | 1.18% |
GFT.DE GFT Technologies SE | 2.73% | 2.64% | 2.26% | 1.44% | 1.03% | 0.43% | 1.68% | 2.58% | 4.48% | 2.30% | 1.46% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
KTN.DE vs. GFT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KTN.DE drawdown since its inception was -98.43%, roughly equal to the maximum GFT.DE drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTN.DE and GFT.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KTN.DE | GFT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.43% | -98.96% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.76% | -44.79% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.85% | -69.31% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.19% | -72.04% | +14.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.95% | -68.88% | +35.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.46% | -79.47% | +14.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.33% | 25.38% | -10.05% |
Volatility
KTN.DE vs. GFT.DE - Volatility Comparison
Kontron AG (KTN.DE) has a higher volatility of 20.97% compared to GFT Technologies SE (GFT.DE) at 16.64%. This indicates that KTN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KTN.DE | GFT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.97% | 16.64% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.12% | 30.22% | +2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.09% | 46.27% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 43.33% | -3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.87% | 44.26% | -3.39% |
Financials
KTN.DE vs. GFT.DE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kontron AG and GFT Technologies SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities