PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNX vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KNX vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNX achieves a 48.96% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's 12.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with KNX having a 12.48% annualized return and IBM not far ahead at 13.09%.


KNX

1D
-0.39%
1M
21.28%
YTD
48.96%
6M
60.02%
1Y
78.90%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
12.48%

IBM

1D
2.75%
1M
42.83%
YTD
12.60%
6M
10.53%
1Y
27.95%
3Y*
39.91%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
13.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNX vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
48.96%0.09%-6.86%11.11%-13.20%46.82%17.64%44.01%-42.30%33.16%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
12.60%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between KNX and IBM is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 1994

0.26

The correlation between KNX and IBM shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KNX:

$12.66B

IBM:

$313.46B

EPS

KNX:

$0.21

IBM:

$11.32

PE Ratio

KNX:

371.78

IBM:

29.08

PS Ratio

KNX:

1.69

IBM:

4.54

PB Ratio

KNX:

1.80

IBM:

9.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

KNX:

$7.50B

IBM:

$68.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KNX:

$2.29B

IBM:

$40.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

KNX:

$912.37M

IBM:

$15.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNX vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNX
KNX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
KNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
KNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNX vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNXIBMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

0.73

+1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

1.24

+1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.18

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

0.98

+3.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.86

2.14

+7.72

KNX vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNX and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNXIBMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

0.73

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.88

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.50

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.31

-0.02

Drawdowns

KNX vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNX drawdown since its inception was -67.93%, roughly equal to the maximum IBM drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNX and IBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNXIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.93%

-69.40%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.91%

-30.96%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.85%

-30.96%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.04%

-30.96%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.57%

-40.59%

-10.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-20.12%

+3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.89%

14.16%

-6.27%

Volatility

KNX vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) is 16.23%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 18.62%. This indicates that KNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNXIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.23%

18.62%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.50%

33.26%

-4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.10%

38.35%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.34%

26.83%

+6.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.90%

26.42%

+7.48%

Dividends

KNX vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

KNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than IBM's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.04%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
0.95%1.38%1.21%0.97%0.92%0.62%0.77%0.67%0.96%0.55%0.73%0.99%

Financials

KNX vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
1.85B
15.92B
(KNX) Total Revenue
(IBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KNX vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
33.1%
56.2%
Portfolio components
KNX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 611.56M and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.

IBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.

KNX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 28.58M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

IBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

KNX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. reported a net income of -1.32M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.

IBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KNX and IBM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBM has higher volatility (18.62%) compared to KNX (16.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNX dropped -67.93% vs IBM's -69.40%.

KNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNX and IBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer