PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNX vs. CP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KNX vs. CP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNX achieves a 33.77% return, which is significantly higher than CP's 21.24% return. Over the past 10 years, KNX has underperformed CP with an annualized return of 10.32%, while CP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


KNX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-8.93%
6M
26.93%
YTD
33.77%
1Y
70.68%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.32%
ALL TIME*
13.24%

CP

1D
0.83%
1M
1.25%
6M
20.08%
YTD
21.24%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$233.07M$226.64M$247.01M
$348.85M$312.95M$336.68M

KNX vs. CP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
33.77%0.09%-6.86%11.11%-13.20%46.82%17.64%44.01%-42.30%33.16%
CP
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
21.24%2.60%-7.84%6.85%4.71%4.64%37.33%45.04%-1.81%29.32%

Correlation

The correlation between KNX and CP is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 1994

0.32

The correlation between KNX and CP shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KNX:

$11.30B

CP:

$78.14B

EPS

KNX:

$0.26

CP:

$4.85

PE Ratio

KNX:

263.94

CP:

18.31

PS Ratio

KNX:

1.47

CP:

4.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

KNX:

$7.73B

CP:

$16.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KNX:

$2.43B

CP:

$7.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

KNX:

$928.50M

CP:

$9.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNX vs. CP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KNX
KNX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
KNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
KNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CP
CP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KNX vs. CP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNXCPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.18

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

1.68

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

3.99

+5.98

KNX vs. CP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the CP Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNX and CP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNX vs. CP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNX drawdown since its inception was -67.93%, roughly equal to the maximum CP drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNX and CP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNXCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.93%

-69.17%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.95%

-13.10%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.71%

-25.88%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.04%

-25.88%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.57%

-33.70%

-17.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.67%

-5.14%

-10.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-20.24%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

5.51%

+1.12%

Volatility

KNX vs. CP - Volatility Comparison

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CP) at 6.30%. This indicates that KNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNXCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.77%

6.30%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.40%

16.47%

+12.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.98%

22.84%

+17.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.61%

24.38%

+9.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

25.49%

+8.48%

Dividends

KNX vs. CP - Dividend Comparison

KNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than CP's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CP
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
0.77%0.86%0.76%0.78%0.96%0.84%0.76%0.93%1.07%0.92%0.98%0.98%
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
1.09%1.38%1.21%0.97%0.92%0.62%0.77%0.67%0.96%0.55%0.73%0.99%

Financials

KNX vs. CP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

KNX vs. CP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

KNX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 697.39M and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

CP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 5.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.0%.

KNX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 104.85M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

CP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.

KNX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 43.19M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.

CP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited reported a net income of 1.18B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KNX and CP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to CP (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNX dropped -67.93% vs CP's -69.17%.

KNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNX and CP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer