KMP-UN.TO vs. MI-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (KMP-UN.TO) and Minto Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (MI-UN.TO).
Performance
KMP-UN.TO vs. MI-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KMP-UN.TO vs. MI-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMP-UN.TO Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.22% | -0.06% | -1.08% | 15.35% | -28.55% | 42.61% | -6.13% | 22.98% | 10.18% |
MI-UN.TO Minto Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust | 29.76% | 6.16% | -19.49% | 19.12% | -33.87% | 9.73% | -10.01% | 27.72% | -100.02% |
Fundamentals
KMP-UN.TO:
CA$1.97B
MI-UN.TO:
CA$1.09B
KMP-UN.TO:
CA$0.24
MI-UN.TO:
-CA$4.49
KMP-UN.TO:
5.17
MI-UN.TO:
6.12
KMP-UN.TO:
0.64
MI-UN.TO:
1.35
KMP-UN.TO:
CA$384.64M
MI-UN.TO:
CA$156.03M
KMP-UN.TO:
CA$255.37M
MI-UN.TO:
CA$99.53M
KMP-UN.TO:
CA$55.92M
MI-UN.TO:
-CA$158.55M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMP-UN.TO achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than MI-UN.TO's 29.76% return.
KMP-UN.TO
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- -7.65%
- 1Y
- -3.12%
- 3Y*
- 2.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
MI-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 29.76%
- 6M
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- 34.30%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- -2.22%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMP-UN.TO vs. MI-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KMP-UN.TO
MI-UN.TO
KMP-UN.TO vs. MI-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (KMP-UN.TO) and Minto Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (MI-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KMP-UN.TO | MI-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | 1.04 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | 2.60 | -2.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.37 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 3.17 | -3.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 6.14 | -6.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KMP-UN.TO | MI-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | 1.04 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | -0.09 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between KMP-UN.TO and MI-UN.TO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KMP-UN.TO vs. MI-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
KMP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than MI-UN.TO's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMP-UN.TO Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust | 4.43% | 4.39% | 4.11% | 3.90% | 4.32% | 2.91% | 3.95% | 3.47% | 3.99% | 4.34% | 5.03% | 5.71% |
MI-UN.TO Minto Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.00% | 3.82% | 3.98% | 3.05% | 3.43% | 2.10% | 2.20% | 1.83% | 510,811.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KMP-UN.TO vs. MI-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MI-UN.TO drawdown of -100.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMP-UN.TO and MI-UN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMP-UN.TO | MI-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -100.03% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.83% | -10.89% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.56% | -48.58% | +13.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.07% | -100.02% | +79.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -99.10% | +84.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | 5.62% | +4.11% |
Volatility
KMP-UN.TO vs. MI-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (KMP-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Minto Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (MI-UN.TO) at 1.27%. This indicates that KMP-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MI-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KMP-UN.TO | MI-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 1.27% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 25.33% | -14.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 33.09% | -14.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 25.94% | -6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 50.78% | -29.02% |
Financials
KMP-UN.TO vs. MI-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Killam Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust and Minto Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities