KBWP vs. PGR
KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while PGR (The Progressive Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, KBWP returned 12.39%/yr vs 24.55%/yr for PGR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
KBWP vs. PGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than PGR's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWP has underperformed PGR with an annualized return of 12.39%, while PGR has yielded a comparatively higher 24.55% annualized return.
KBWP
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- -2.38%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
PGR
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- -13.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- 20.31%
- 10Y*
- 24.55%
KBWP vs. PGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | -1.94% | 11.49% | 30.45% | 7.09% | 10.16% | 20.61% | -2.05% | 28.67% | -2.76% | 8.86% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 0.79% | -3.02% | 51.39% | 23.16% | 26.81% | 10.84% | 41.48% | 25.14% | 9.39% | 61.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBWP and PGR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2010 | 0.58 |
The correlation between KBWP and PGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBWP vs. PGR — Risk / Return Rank
KBWP
PGR
KBWP vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBWP | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.91 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | -0.58 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | -0.88 | +1.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBWP vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum PGR drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and PGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBWP | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -71.06% | +31.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -24.02% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -30.35% | +18.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.00% | -30.35% | +13.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | -30.35% | -9.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -21.10% | +18.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -14.54% | +10.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.36% | 15.74% | -11.38% |
Volatility
KBWP vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) is 5.82%, while The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that KBWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBWP | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 7.85% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 16.67% | -4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 22.77% | -6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 24.60% | -6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 24.51% | -3.78% |
Dividends
KBWP vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison
KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than PGR's 6.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | 2.00% | 1.58% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.99% | 3.02% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 2.11% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 1.35% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 6.44% | 2.15% | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 6.23% | 2.68% | 3.89% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 2.50% | 2.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBWP and PGR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGR has higher volatility (7.85%) compared to KBWP (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs PGR's -71.06%.
KBWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBWP and PGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer