KALL vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
KALL and VTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KALL is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Feb 13, 2015. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on May 24, 2001. Both KALL and VTI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KALL or VTI.
Key characteristics
| KALL | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.49% | 26.35% |
| 1Y Return | 17.71% | 40.48% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.07% | 8.68% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.61% | 15.37% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.54 | 3.10 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.98 | 4.13 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.58 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.29 | 4.21 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.74 | 20.25 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.50% | 1.94% |
| Daily Std Dev | 30.76% | 12.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.32% | -55.45% |
| Current Drawdown | -41.74% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between KALL and VTI is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KALL vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KALL achieves a 19.49% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 26.35% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KALL vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KALL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KALL vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KALL vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
KALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than VTI's 1.26% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KALL KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF | 2.82% | 3.37% | 2.28% | 4.63% | 1.01% | 1.45% | 2.06% | 1.21% | 6.62% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.26% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
KALL vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KALL drawdown since its inception was -56.32%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALL and VTI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KALL vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.11%. This indicates that KALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.