PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPXN vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPXN vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JPXN having a 15.82% return and VEA slightly lower at 15.19%. Over the past 10 years, JPXN has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 9.05%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.


JPXN

1D
0.09%
1M
4.27%
YTD
15.82%
6M
16.06%
1Y
30.74%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
9.05%

VEA

1D
0.24%
1M
4.15%
YTD
15.19%
6M
18.13%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPXN vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPXN
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF
15.82%26.03%6.48%19.69%-16.29%0.16%15.12%19.40%-14.87%24.41%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
15.19%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JPXN and VEA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.78

The correlation between JPXN and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPXN vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPXN
VEA

Industrials

28.3%
19.2%

Technology

17.3%
13.8%

Financial Services

13.7%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
7.5%

Communication Services

7.8%
3.4%

Healthcare

6.2%
8.2%

Basic Materials

5.0%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.6%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.7%

Utilities

1.6%
3.3%

Energy

1.4%
5.4%

Industrials

JPXN
28.3%
VEA
19.2%

Technology

JPXN
17.3%
VEA
13.8%

Financial Services

JPXN
13.7%
VEA
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JPXN
11.3%
VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

JPXN
7.8%
VEA
3.4%

Healthcare

JPXN
6.2%
VEA
8.2%

Basic Materials

JPXN
5.0%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

JPXN
4.8%
VEA
5.6%

Real Estate

JPXN
2.8%
VEA
2.7%

Utilities

JPXN
1.6%
VEA
3.3%

Energy

JPXN
1.4%
VEA
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPXN vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPXN
JPXN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPXN vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPXNVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.77

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

10.82

-2.61

JPXN vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPXN and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPXNVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.06

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.59

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.59

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.25

+0.02

Drawdowns

JPXN vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPXN drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPXN and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPXNVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-60.68%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-11.63%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.95%

-13.45%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.21%

-29.71%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.21%

-35.73%

+2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.66%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-13.29%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

2.98%

+0.78%

Volatility

JPXN vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) is 4.26%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that JPXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPXNVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

5.49%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

13.32%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

15.64%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

16.54%

+1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.35%

-0.29%

JPXN vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPXN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPXN vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

JPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than VEA's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPXN
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF
2.71%3.14%2.29%2.57%1.47%2.63%1.27%1.92%1.60%1.50%2.07%1.32%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.61%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPXN and VEA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to JPXN (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPXN dropped -55.54% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.13% vs 9.05% for JPXN. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JPXN has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.13% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for JPXN.

JPXN has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.61% for VEA.

JPXN is categorized as Japan Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. JPXN tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for JPXN and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPXN and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer