JPMB vs. EMBX
JPMB (JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF) and EMBX (VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. JPMB is passively managed, while EMBX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPMB returned 1.42%/yr vs 4.09%/yr for EMBX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPMB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for EMBX.
Performance
JPMB vs. EMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPMB achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than EMBX's 3.35% return.
JPMB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 10.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- —
EMBX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
JPMB vs. EMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPMB JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF | 1.95% | 13.73% | 1.46% | 9.48% | -16.05% | -2.26% | 5.36% | 17.71% | -4.74% |
EMBX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 3.35% | 18.80% | 3.09% | 9.34% | -7.21% | -4.30% | 11.57% | 13.10% | -7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPMB and EMBX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between JPMB and EMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPMB vs. EMBX — Risk / Return Rank
JPMB
EMBX
JPMB vs. EMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) and VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPMB | EMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.56 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | 10.74 | -0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPMB vs. EMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPMB drawdown since its inception was -26.33%, roughly equal to the maximum EMBX drawdown of -25.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPMB and EMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPMB | EMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.33% | -25.11% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -5.14% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.53% | -7.41% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.16% | -23.09% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -1.21% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -7.05% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 1.22% | -0.14% |
Volatility
JPMB vs. EMBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) is 1.79%, while VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX) has a volatility of 2.08%. This indicates that JPMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPMB | EMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 2.08% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.53% | 5.08% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.43% | 5.97% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 6.14% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.63% | 6.67% | +2.96% |
JPMB vs. EMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPMB vs. EMBX - Dividend Comparison
JPMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, less than EMBX's 5.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBX VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.92% | 6.95% | 8.20% | 5.49% | 8.21% | 5.50% | 6.56% | 7.89% | 7.25% | 7.66% | 3.94% | 6.84% |
JPMB JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF | 5.78% | 6.71% | 6.32% | 5.99% | 4.94% | 4.29% | 4.29% | 4.51% | 4.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPMB and EMBX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMBX has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to JPMB (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPMB dropped -26.33% vs EMBX's -25.11%.
On 5-year performance, EMBX leads with 4.09% vs 1.42% for JPMB. On fees, JPMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JPMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMBX has performed better with a 4.09% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for EMBX.
EMBX has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 5.78% for JPMB.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JPMB and 0.76% for EMBX.
EMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPMB and EMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer