JPM.NEO vs. ZEB.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Chase & Co CDR (JPM.NEO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO).

ZEB.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. It was launched on Oct 19, 2009.

Performance

JPM.NEO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in JPMorgan Chase & Co CDR (JPM.NEO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JPM.NEO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JPM.NEO JPMorgan Chase & Co CDR	-8.84%	35.25%	43.26%	30.21%	-13.39%	-1.52%
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	3.26%	43.43%	24.58%	10.87%	-10.38%	5.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPM.NEO achieves a -8.84% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 3.26% return.

JPM.NEO

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.99%
• YTD: -8.84%
• 6M: -5.25%
• 1Y: 21.33%
• 3Y*: 33.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZEB.TO

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -3.25%
• YTD: 3.26%
• 6M: 15.57%
• 1Y: 54.03%
• 3Y*: 26.17%
• 5Y*: 17.10%
• 10Y*: 14.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

JPM.NEO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPM.NEO

JPM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 65
JPM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
JPM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
JPM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
JPM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
JPM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

ZEB.TO

ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPM.NEO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Chase & Co CDR (JPM.NEO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JPM.NEO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	4.06	-3.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	5.16	-3.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.79	-0.62
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	6.41	-5.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.40	24.68	-21.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JPM.NEO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPM.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPM.NEO and ZEB.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JPM.NEO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	4.06	-3.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.83	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between JPM.NEO and ZEB.TO is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

JPM.NEO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

JPM.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JPM.NEO JPMorgan Chase & Co CDR	2.75%	2.43%	2.65%	3.22%	3.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	2.91%	2.95%	3.98%	4.75%	4.29%	3.13%	4.15%	3.65%	3.64%	3.02%	3.19%	3.70%

Drawdowns

JPM.NEO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -38.14%, roughly equal to the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPM.NEO and ZEB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	JPM.NEO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.14%	-39.69%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.26%	-8.44%	-7.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.53%	-4.62%	-7.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.32%	-5.70%	-4.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.92%	2.19%	+3.73%

Volatility

JPM.NEO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Chase & Co CDR (JPM.NEO) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) at 5.93%. This indicates that JPM.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JPM.NEO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.35%	5.93%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.71%	10.04%	+6.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.04%	13.39%	+11.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.45%	13.25%	+12.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.45%	16.83%	+8.62%