PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGSA.L vs. JEPQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JGSA.L vs. JEPQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc (JGSA.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JGSA.L vs. JEPQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

JGSA.L is traded in GBP, while JEPQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JEPQ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGSA.L achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ.L's -0.31% return.


JGSA.L

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
0.47%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
4.94%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*

JEPQ.L

1D
2.92%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
-0.31%
6M
4.75%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JGSA.L vs. JEPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGSA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JGSA.L vs. JEPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGSA.L
JGSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JGSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JGSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ.L
JEPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
JEPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGSA.L vs. JEPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc (JGSA.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JGSA.LJEPQ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.81

1.15

+5.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

11.59

1.67

+9.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.28

1.24

+2.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.33

3.21

+7.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

54.64

11.04

+43.60

JGSA.L vs. JEPQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.81, which is higher than the JEPQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGSA.L and JEPQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JGSA.LJEPQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.81

1.15

+5.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.23

0.53

+3.70

Correlation

The correlation between JGSA.L and JEPQ.L is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

JGSA.L vs. JEPQ.L - Dividend Comparison

JGSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.07%.


Drawdowns

JGSA.L vs. JEPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGSA.L drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, smaller than the maximum JEPQ.L drawdown of -22.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGSA.L and JEPQ.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JGSA.LJEPQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-20.10%

+18.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.42%

-11.21%

+10.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-4.68%

+4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-3.03%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

1.97%

-1.89%

Volatility

JGSA.L vs. JEPQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc (JGSA.L) is 0.30%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that JGSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JGSA.LJEPQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

5.49%

-5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.42%

10.45%

-10.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

16.33%

-15.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.54%

16.60%

-16.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.61%

16.60%

-15.99%