PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANZ vs. BUFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JANZ vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JANZ vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JANZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF
-2.92%12.47%6.73%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
-0.84%12.92%6.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANZ achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly lower than BUFP's -0.84% return.


JANZ

1D
0.64%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-2.92%
6M
-1.38%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
13.27%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*

BUFP

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
-0.84%
6M
1.58%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JANZ vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JANZ vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANZ
JANZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
JANZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
JANZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANZ vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JANZBUFPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.25

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.89

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.73

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.42

9.93

-3.52

JANZ vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANZ and BUFP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANZBUFPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.25

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

1.05

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between JANZ and BUFP is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JANZ vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

JANZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than BUFP's 0.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
JANZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF
1.46%1.42%2.70%2.58%0.21%4.52%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

JANZ vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANZ drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANZ and BUFP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JANZBUFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-11.98%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-8.16%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

-2.05%

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-1.08%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.42%

+0.57%

Volatility

JANZ vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 3.45%. This indicates that JANZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JANZBUFPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

3.45%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

5.01%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

11.12%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.15%

9.78%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.08%

9.78%

+3.30%