PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JABLX vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JABLX vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JABLX achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, JABLX has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 10.75%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.


JABLX

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.06%
YTD
3.48%
6M
3.00%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.75%

VHT

1D
1.30%
1M
2.66%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
-0.44%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JABLX vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JABLX
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
3.48%15.13%15.42%15.41%-16.36%17.20%14.21%22.60%0.68%18.44%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-0.03%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between JABLX and VHT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between JABLX and VHT has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JABLX vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JABLX
JABLX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
JABLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JABLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JABLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JABLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JABLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JABLX vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JABLXVHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.87

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

4.59

+3.02

JABLX vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JABLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JABLX and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JABLX vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JABLX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum VHT drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABLX and VHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JABLXVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.07%

-39.12%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-10.40%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.89%

-16.91%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-17.71%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.47%

-28.85%

+6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-3.20%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-5.98%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

4.22%

-2.33%

Volatility

JABLX vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) is 3.51%, while Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that JABLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JABLXVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

5.02%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

10.49%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.23%

14.72%

-5.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.24%

15.03%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.16%

16.95%

-5.79%

JABLX vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JABLX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

JABLX vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

JABLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.70%, more than VHT's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JABLX
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
10.70%5.16%2.02%2.01%4.78%1.58%3.14%4.43%5.22%1.71%3.64%5.22%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.64%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


JABLX and VHT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VHT has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to JABLX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JABLX dropped -27.07% vs VHT's -39.12%.

JABLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JABLX and VHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer