IYK vs. XLF
IYK (iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYK is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYK returned 8.83%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for XLF. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYK charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
IYK vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYK achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -4.22% return. Over the past 10 years, IYK has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 8.83%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.60% annualized return.
IYK
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 5.46%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- 1.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
XLF
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
IYK vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 5.46% | 4.78% | 5.27% | -2.84% | 3.57% | 17.32% | 32.65% | 28.12% | -13.84% | 16.53% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -4.22% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYK and XLF is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2000 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IYK and XLF has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IYK vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYK
XLF
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
IYK
XLF
-
Healthcare
IYK
XLF
-
Basic Materials
IYK
XLF
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYK
XLF
-
Industrials
IYK
XLF
Communication Services
IYK
-
XLF
-
Energy
IYK
-
XLF
-
Financial Services
IYK
-
XLF
Real Estate
IYK
-
XLF
-
Technology
IYK
-
XLF
Utilities
IYK
-
XLF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYK vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
IYK
XLF
IYK vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYK | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.06 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 0.29 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 0.77 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYK | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 0.30 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.44 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.21 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
IYK vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYK drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYK and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYK | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.64% | -82.69% | +40.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -14.79% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.14% | -15.54% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.05% | -25.81% | +10.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.19% | -42.86% | +9.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -6.99% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -20.02% | +14.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 5.68% | -0.63% |
Volatility
IYK vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) is 3.51%, while State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that IYK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYK | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 4.21% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 11.24% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 14.63% | -2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 18.66% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 22.17% | -6.67% |
IYK vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYK has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYK vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
IYK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than XLF's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 2.69% | 2.75% | 2.63% | 2.74% | 2.16% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 2.21% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 2.63% | 2.11% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.52% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYK and XLF have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLF has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to IYK (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYK dropped -42.64% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 12.60% vs 8.83% for IYK. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IYK has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 12.60% return vs 8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYK.
IYK has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.52% for XLF.
IYK is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XLF is Financials Equities. IYK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYK and 0.08% for XLF.
XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYK and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer