PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUA.DE vs. CSY9.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IXUA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF USD Acc (IXUA.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IXUA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXUA.DE achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's -1.04% return.


IXUA.DE

1D
2.75%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
3.63%
6M
8.80%
1Y
17.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSY9.DE

1D
0.55%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
-1.04%
6M
0.52%
1Y
-3.44%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IXUA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IXUA.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUA.DE
IXUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IXUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CSY9.DE
CSY9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF USD Acc (IXUA.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXUA.DECSY9.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

-0.30

+1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

-0.32

+1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.96

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

-0.34

+2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.86

-0.97

+8.84

IXUA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUA.DE and CSY9.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXUA.DECSY9.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

-0.30

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.55

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between IXUA.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IXUA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IXUA.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IXUA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.58%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUA.DE and CSY9.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUA.DECSY9.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.58%

-13.92%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-10.38%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

-6.70%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.14%

-3.66%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.94%

-0.61%

Volatility

IXUA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World ex-USA UCITS ETF USD Acc (IXUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 3.00%. This indicates that IXUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IXUA.DECSY9.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

3.00%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

5.79%

+3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

11.51%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

12.06%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

12.03%

+2.70%