IWSZ.L vs. SWDA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World Mid-Cap Equal Weight UCITS ETF (IWSZ.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L).
IWSZ.L and SWDA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWSZ.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Mid-Cap Equal Weighted Index. It was launched on Oct 3, 2014. SWDA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both IWSZ.L and SWDA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IWSZ.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWSZ.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWSZ.L iShares MSCI World Mid-Cap Equal Weight UCITS ETF | 0.73% | 21.40% | 5.93% | 16.04% | -17.96% | 12.56% | 10.79% | 23.39% | -14.41% | 24.35% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -2.41% | 21.14% | 19.09% | 23.79% | -18.13% | 22.52% | 15.68% | 27.97% | -9.23% | 22.42% |
Different Trading Currencies
IWSZ.L is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWSZ.L achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than SWDA.L's -4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IWSZ.L has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 8.15%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.
IWSZ.L
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- 1Y
- 20.15%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -1.47%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWSZ.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWSZ.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWSZ.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWSZ.L
SWDA.L
IWSZ.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Mid-Cap Equal Weight UCITS ETF (IWSZ.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWSZ.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 1.13 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.61 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.94 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | 7.84 | +0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWSZ.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.13 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.65 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.75 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.67 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWSZ.L and SWDA.L is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IWSZ.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWSZ.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IWSZ.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWSZ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.11%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWSZ.L and SWDA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWSZ.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.11% | -25.58% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -10.26% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.13% | -18.50% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.11% | -25.58% | -12.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -3.59% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -3.52% | -3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 1.79% | +0.71% |
Volatility
IWSZ.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Mid-Cap Equal Weight UCITS ETF (IWSZ.L) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 4.26%. This indicates that IWSZ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWSZ.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 4.26% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 8.47% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37% | 15.35% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 15.30% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 15.70% | +0.81% |