PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFL vs. GGLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IWFL vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IWFL vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IWFL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN
-20.92%18.54%61.94%84.47%-17.58%
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
-18.90%123.07%48.88%81.20%-30.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFL achieves a -20.92% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's -18.90% return.


IWFL

1D
8.62%
1M
-7.73%
YTD
-20.92%
6M
-20.42%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
29.85%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*

GGLL

1D
10.22%
1M
-16.24%
YTD
-18.90%
6M
28.40%
1Y
186.52%
3Y*
57.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWFL vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLL's 1.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IWFL vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFL
IWFL Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IWFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

GGLL
GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFL vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWFLGGLLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

3.08

-2.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.93

3.47

-2.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

4.88

-4.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.92

18.04

-16.12

IWFL vs. GGLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the GGLL Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFL and GGLL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFLGGLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

3.08

-2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.75

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between IWFL and GGLL is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IWFL vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison

IWFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%.


TTM2025202420232022
IWFL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
5.63%4.16%3.29%2.05%0.59%

Drawdowns

IWFL vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFL drawdown since its inception was -59.29%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFL and GGLL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFLGGLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.29%

-52.81%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.80%

-38.39%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.01%

-32.09%

+5.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.34%

-15.49%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.30%

10.38%

-0.08%

Volatility

IWFL vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) is 15.12%, while Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a volatility of 18.25%. This indicates that IWFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IWFLGGLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.12%

18.25%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.96%

39.37%

-12.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.71%

60.98%

-5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.77%

55.13%

-8.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.78%

55.13%

-8.35%