IS.TO vs. ZAG.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp (IS.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO).

ZAG.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010.

Performance

IS.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp (IS.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IS.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IS.TO Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp	17.65%	19.09%	17.62%	-11.75%	-12.55%	-6.80%
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF	-0.11%	2.25%	4.48%	6.41%	-11.60%	3.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS.TO achieves a 17.65% return, which is significantly higher than ZAG.TO's -0.11% return.

IS.TO

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 6M: 19.97%
• 1Y: 39.40%
• 3Y*: 15.16%
• 5Y*: 3.19%
• 10Y*: —

ZAG.TO

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: -0.19%
• 1Y: 0.05%
• 3Y*: 3.29%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: 1.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IS.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS.TO

IS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
IS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
IS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
IS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

ZAG.TO

ZAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 12
ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
ZAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ZAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 10
ZAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ZAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp (IS.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IS.TO	ZAG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	0.01	+2.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	0.05	+2.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.01	+0.45
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.21	0.14	+4.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.34	0.29	+16.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IS.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS.TO and ZAG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IS.TO	ZAG.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	0.01	+2.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.08	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.44	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between IS.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IS.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison

IS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than ZAG.TO's 3.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IS.TO Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp	9.32%	10.57%	8.69%	3.60%	3.07%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF	3.49%	3.48%	3.44%	3.47%	3.56%	3.04%	2.88%	3.03%	2.92%	2.95%	3.07%	3.13%

Drawdowns

IS.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.89%, which is greater than ZAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS.TO and ZAG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IS.TO	ZAG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.89%	-18.03%	-19.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.14%	-2.79%	-6.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.89%	-15.77%	-22.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-2.85%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.70%	-3.56%	-14.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	1.41%	+0.94%

Volatility

IS.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Infrastructure Dividend Split Corp (IS.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) at 1.91%. This indicates that IS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IS.TO	ZAG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	1.91%	+2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.37%	2.97%	+7.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.63%	4.65%	+13.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.32%	6.53%	+15.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.25%	7.09%	+15.16%