IQQ4.DE vs. ESAD.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE).

IQQ4.DE and ESAD.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQQ4.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Asia Dividend+. It was launched on Oct 20, 2006. ESAD.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. It was launched on Dec 6, 2024. Both IQQ4.DE and ESAD.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IQQ4.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IQQ4.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IQQ4.DE iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF	-1.73%	15.95%	-4.23%	-5.70%	-4.57%
ESAD.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation	4.04%	-3.81%	3.54%	7.64%	-19.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQ4.DE achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than ESAD.DE's 4.04% return.

IQQ4.DE

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -5.62%
• YTD: -1.73%
• 6M: -0.21%
• 1Y: 10.58%
• 3Y*: 1.48%
• 5Y*: -0.24%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

ESAD.DE

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -4.17%
• YTD: 4.04%
• 6M: 3.41%
• 1Y: 1.61%
• 3Y*: 4.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQ4.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQ4.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ESAD.DE's 0.41% expense ratio.

IQQ4.DE

iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF

ESAD.DE

BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation

Return for Risk

IQQ4.DE vs. ESAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQ4.DE

IQQ4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 40
IQQ4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
IQQ4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
IQQ4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 37
IQQ4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IQQ4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 42

ESAD.DE

ESAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 16
ESAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
ESAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ESAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ESAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
ESAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQ4.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQQ4.DE	ESAD.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	0.11	+0.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	0.24	+1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.03	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	0.55	+0.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.01	1.64	+3.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQQ4.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQ4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the ESAD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQ4.DE and ESAD.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQQ4.DE	ESAD.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	0.11	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	-0.19	+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between IQQ4.DE and ESAD.DE is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IQQ4.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQ4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, while ESAD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQQ4.DE iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF	3.51%	3.52%	4.07%	3.83%	3.77%	2.92%	3.50%	2.93%	3.32%	3.19%	2.92%	3.48%
ESAD.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IQQ4.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQ4.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.50%, which is greater than ESAD.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ4.DE and ESAD.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQQ4.DE	ESAD.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.50%	-30.37%	-36.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-8.80%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.19%	-14.50%	+1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.28%	-17.84%	-2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.77%	-0.33%

Volatility

IQQ4.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) is 4.20%, while BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that IQQ4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESAD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQQ4.DE	ESAD.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	4.75%	-0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	8.73%	-0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.98%	14.18%	-2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.84%	14.91%	-3.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.77%	14.91%	-0.14%