INPAX vs. PUDZX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX).
INPAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 17, 2012. PUDZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2010.
Performance
INPAX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INPAX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPAX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio | -0.71% | 13.33% | 9.26% | 9.53% | -8.71% | 12.96% | 5.72% | 15.82% | -3.60% | 11.57% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 10.18% | 13.40% | 8.61% | 3.26% | -2.76% | 18.49% | 4.84% | 16.29% | -9.20% | 6.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INPAX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 10.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INPAX having a 6.85% annualized return and PUDZX not far ahead at 7.01%.
INPAX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 10.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 6.85%
PUDZX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INPAX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INPAX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INPAX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank
INPAX
PUDZX
INPAX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INPAX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 2.04 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 2.65 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.45 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 13.65 | -6.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INPAX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.04 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.87 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.73 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.52 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between INPAX and PUDZX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
INPAX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison
INPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than PUDZX's 8.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPAX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio | 4.91% | 4.87% | 5.21% | 4.82% | 4.90% | 4.43% | 5.59% | 4.57% | 4.85% | 3.29% | 3.58% | 3.90% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 8.10% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 3.66% | 9.10% | 13.00% | 4.94% | 3.40% | 2.14% | 2.10% | 1.39% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
INPAX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INPAX drawdown since its inception was -21.25%, roughly equal to the maximum PUDZX drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INPAX and PUDZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INPAX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.25% | -21.53% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -8.20% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.36% | -17.98% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.25% | -21.53% | +0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -1.59% | -3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -5.31% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 1.47% | -0.01% |
Volatility
INPAX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 2.71%. This indicates that INPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INPAX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 2.71% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.73% | 6.29% | -1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.68% | 9.72% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.52% | 10.59% | -3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.35% | 9.70% | -1.35% |