PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ING vs. MUSA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ING and MUSA is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

ING vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ING Groep N.V. (ING) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.05%
-13.00%
ING
MUSA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ING:

1.58

MUSA:

0.47

Sortino Ratio

ING:

2.16

MUSA:

0.83

Omega Ratio

ING:

1.28

MUSA:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

ING:

0.71

MUSA:

0.58

Martin Ratio

ING:

4.23

MUSA:

1.82

Ulcer Index

ING:

8.51%

MUSA:

6.25%

Daily Std Dev

ING:

22.90%

MUSA:

23.98%

Max Drawdown

ING:

-92.98%

MUSA:

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

ING:

-32.18%

MUSA:

-19.62%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ING:

$52.49B

MUSA:

$8.94B

EPS

ING:

$2.06

MUSA:

$24.11

PE Ratio

ING:

8.31

MUSA:

18.52

PEG Ratio

ING:

0.41

MUSA:

2.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

ING:

$22.62B

MUSA:

$20.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ING:

$22.60B

MUSA:

$5.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

ING:

$967.00M

MUSA:

$951.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ING achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than MUSA's -11.02% return. Over the past 10 years, ING has underperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 7.09%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 20.45% annualized return.


ING

YTD

10.44%

1M

4.65%

6M

-3.05%

1Y

35.81%

5Y*

16.50%

10Y*

7.09%

MUSA

YTD

-11.02%

1M

-7.41%

6M

-13.00%

1Y

10.02%

5Y*

34.65%

10Y*

20.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ING vs. MUSA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ING
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ING is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ING is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ING is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ING is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ING is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ING is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MUSA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUSA is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUSA is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUSA is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUSA is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUSA is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUSA is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ING vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ING Groep N.V. (ING) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ING, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.001.580.47
The chart of Sortino ratio for ING, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.160.83
The chart of Omega ratio for ING, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.281.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for ING, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.880.58
The chart of Martin ratio for ING, currently valued at 4.23, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.004.231.82
ING
MUSA

The current ING Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the MUSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ING and MUSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.58
0.47
ING
MUSA

Dividends

ING vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison

ING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than MUSA's 0.40% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ING
ING Groep N.V.
7.98%7.65%5.86%7.17%5.09%0.00%6.33%7.64%3.99%5.24%2.95%
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
0.40%0.36%0.43%0.45%0.52%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ING vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ING drawdown since its inception was -92.98%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ING and MUSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.26%
-19.62%
ING
MUSA

Volatility

ING vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ING Groep N.V. (ING) is 6.20%, while Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that ING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.20%
8.67%
ING
MUSA

Financials

ING vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ING Groep N.V. and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab