ING vs. MUSA
Compare and contrast key facts about ING Groep N.V. (ING) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ING or MUSA.
Correlation
The correlation between ING and MUSA is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ING vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ING:
0.46
MUSA:
0.49
ING:
0.80
MUSA:
0.86
ING:
1.11
MUSA:
1.10
ING:
0.28
MUSA:
0.57
ING:
1.40
MUSA:
1.42
ING:
8.68%
MUSA:
8.62%
ING:
26.19%
MUSA:
24.70%
ING:
-92.98%
MUSA:
-33.72%
ING:
-31.24%
MUSA:
-15.29%
Fundamentals
ING:
$57.24B
MUSA:
$9.30B
ING:
$2.16
MUSA:
$24.11
ING:
8.04
MUSA:
19.50
ING:
0.41
MUSA:
1.77
ING:
$17.03B
MUSA:
$15.40B
ING:
$17.02B
MUSA:
$5.61B
ING:
$1.09B
MUSA:
$833.20M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ING achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly higher than MUSA's -6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ING has underperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 6.95%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.
ING
11.97%
-10.79%
-0.64%
12.51%
36.52%
6.95%
MUSA
-6.22%
0.80%
-2.59%
14.20%
41.68%
21.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ING vs. MUSA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ING
MUSA
ING vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ING Groep N.V. (ING) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ING vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison
ING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than MUSA's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ING ING Groep N.V. | 7.86% | 7.65% | 5.86% | 7.17% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 6.33% | 7.64% | 3.99% | 5.24% | 2.95% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.40% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ING vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ING drawdown since its inception was -92.98%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ING and MUSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ING vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison
ING Groep N.V. (ING) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) at 7.51%. This indicates that ING's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ING vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ING Groep N.V. and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities