PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTM vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTM vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.11% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 10.18%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.


IMTM

1D
-3.05%
1M
0.97%
YTD
11.09%
6M
10.38%
1Y
24.50%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
10.18%

VEA

1D
-3.07%
1M
0.11%
YTD
13.11%
6M
12.98%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.09%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.11%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and VEA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2015

0.84

The correlation between IMTM and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMTM
VEA

Financial Services

28.6%
22.3%

Technology

15.6%
16.6%

Industrials

15.5%
17.5%

Energy

10.0%
4.7%

Basic Materials

9.7%
7.5%

Healthcare

8.9%
7.6%

Utilities

5.3%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
7.4%

Communication Services

1.5%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.5%

Financial Services

IMTM
28.6%
VEA
22.3%

Technology

IMTM
15.6%
VEA
16.6%

Industrials

IMTM
15.5%
VEA
17.5%

Energy

IMTM
10.0%
VEA
4.7%

Basic Materials

IMTM
9.7%
VEA
7.5%

Healthcare

IMTM
8.9%
VEA
7.6%

Utilities

IMTM
5.3%
VEA
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

IMTM
2.1%
VEA
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IMTM
1.8%
VEA
7.4%

Communication Services

IMTM
1.5%
VEA
3.2%

Real Estate

IMTM
1.1%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTM vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMTMVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.62

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

10.06

-2.48

IMTM vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTMVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-60.68%

+28.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-11.63%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-13.45%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-29.71%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.66%

-35.73%

+3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-3.07%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-13.26%

+5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.02%

+0.22%

Volatility

IMTM vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) have volatilities of 7.39% and 7.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTMVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

7.09%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.35%

14.74%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.19%

16.79%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

16.76%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

17.21%

+0.41%

IMTM vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTM vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than VEA's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.41%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.58%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IMTM and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IMTM has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to VEA (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.72% vs 10.18% for IMTM. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 7.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 2.58% for VEA.

IMTM is categorized as Momentum, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTM and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer