IMANX vs. XUTC.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Iman Fund (IMANX) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE).
IMANX is managed by Allied Asset. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000. XUTC.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Information Technology 20/35 Custom. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017.
Performance
IMANX vs. XUTC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMANX vs. XUTC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMANX Iman Fund | 0.26% | 17.91% | 20.60% | 29.36% | -29.79% | 17.07% | 19.88% | 34.69% | -6.17% | 8.51% |
XUTC.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | -9.02% | 23.99% | 36.33% | 57.18% | -31.42% | 32.65% | 45.60% | 49.94% | -1.77% | 10.60% |
Different Trading Currencies
IMANX is traded in USD, while XUTC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XUTC.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMANX achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than XUTC.DE's -9.02% return.
IMANX
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 26.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
XUTC.DE
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- -9.02%
- 6M
- -7.30%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 26.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.40%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMANX vs. XUTC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMANX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XUTC.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMANX vs. XUTC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IMANX
XUTC.DE
IMANX vs. XUTC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iman Fund (IMANX) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMANX | XUTC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 1.74 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 1.67 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.61 | 5.13 | +4.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMANX | XUTC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.69 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.91 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMANX and XUTC.DE is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IMANX vs. XUTC.DE - Dividend Comparison
IMANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than XUTC.DE's 0.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMANX Iman Fund | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 20.20% | 2.72% | 12.50% | 12.25% | 8.71% | 7.93% | 4.32% |
XUTC.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.35% | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.53% | 1.14% | 0.51% | 0.64% | 0.59% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IMANX vs. XUTC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMANX drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, which is greater than XUTC.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMANX and XUTC.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMANX | XUTC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.64% | -31.79% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -16.16% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.32% | -30.48% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.36% | -13.51% | +6.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.81% | -6.44% | -10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 6.05% | -3.20% |
Volatility
IMANX vs. XUTC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Iman Fund (IMANX) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XUTC.DE) at 6.31%. This indicates that IMANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUTC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMANX | XUTC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 6.31% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 15.38% | -3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 25.04% | -4.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 23.61% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 23.37% | -2.69% |