IJPA.L vs. XMJP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L).
IJPA.L and XMJP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IJPA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. XMJP.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Jan 9, 2007. Both IJPA.L and XMJP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IJPA.L vs. XMJP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IJPA.L vs. XMJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc | 7.90% | 27.28% | 6.62% | 19.34% | -16.16% | 0.16% | 14.98% | 18.46% | -14.15% | 25.83% |
XMJP.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 7.56% | 26.35% | 7.32% | 19.88% | -17.03% | 1.19% | 15.78% | 18.95% | -13.82% | 23.97% |
Different Trading Currencies
IJPA.L is traded in USD, while XMJP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMJP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IJPA.L having a 7.90% return and XMJP.L slightly lower at 7.56%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJPA.L having a 9.26% annualized return and XMJP.L not far behind at 9.24%.
IJPA.L
- 1D
- 5.65%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 34.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
XMJP.L
- 1D
- 5.06%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 33.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IJPA.L vs. XMJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJPA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMJP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IJPA.L vs. XMJP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IJPA.L
XMJP.L
IJPA.L vs. XMJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJPA.L | XMJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 1.56 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 2.23 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.65 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | 9.73 | +0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJPA.L | XMJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.56 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.42 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.54 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.24 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between IJPA.L and XMJP.L is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IJPA.L vs. XMJP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IJPA.L nor XMJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IJPA.L vs. XMJP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, smaller than the maximum XMJP.L drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPA.L and XMJP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJPA.L | XMJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.47% | -28.91% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.15% | -10.65% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.47% | -18.48% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.47% | -24.22% | -8.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.51% | -5.37% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -7.48% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.98% | +0.31% |
Volatility
IJPA.L vs. XMJP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) has a higher volatility of 9.66% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) at 9.13%. This indicates that IJPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IJPA.L | XMJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | 9.13% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.26% | 15.59% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.60% | 21.32% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 17.83% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 16.95% | -0.20% |