PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHPCF vs. BSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHPCF vs. BSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Public Limited Company - iShares S&P 500 UCITS ETF (IHPCF) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHPCF achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, IHPCF has outperformed BSV with an annualized return of 14.96%, while BSV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.95% annualized return.


IHPCF

1D
0.00%
1M
5.96%
YTD
10.71%
6M
12.31%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*
14.96%

BSV

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.52%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
1.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHPCF vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHPCF
iShares Public Limited Company - iShares S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.71%17.89%25.53%25.05%-18.42%29.60%17.96%32.81%-6.68%20.97%
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
0.29%6.00%3.78%4.90%-5.49%-1.09%4.70%4.98%1.34%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IHPCF and BSV is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2008

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHPCF vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHPCF
IHPCF Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IHPCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHPCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHPCF Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IHPCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHPCF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BSV
BSV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHPCF vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Public Limited Company - iShares S&P 500 UCITS ETF (IHPCF) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IHPCFBSVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

2.05

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.98

3.29

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.84

1.39

+0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.87

+0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.40

10.07

+5.32

IHPCF vs. BSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHPCF Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the BSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHPCF and BSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IHPCFBSVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.05

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.60

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.83

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.85

-0.20

Drawdowns

IHPCF vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHPCF drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHPCF and BSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHPCFBSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-8.54%

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-1.29%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-1.53%

-16.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.32%

-8.54%

-15.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.40%

-8.54%

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.63%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-0.97%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

0.37%

+1.55%

Volatility

IHPCF vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Public Limited Company - iShares S&P 500 UCITS ETF (IHPCF) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.52%. This indicates that IHPCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHPCFBSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

0.52%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

1.26%

+7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

1.81%

+10.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

2.72%

+14.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.76%

2.37%

+17.39%

Dividends

IHPCF vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison

IHPCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than BSV's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
4.00%3.83%3.38%2.46%1.50%1.45%1.79%2.29%1.99%1.65%1.48%1.40%
IHPCF
iShares Public Limited Company - iShares S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.64%0.69%1.03%1.23%1.43%1.03%1.32%1.49%1.77%0.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHPCF and BSV have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHPCF has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to BSV (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHPCF dropped -33.40% vs BSV's -8.54%.

IHPCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHPCF and BSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer