PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHPCF vs. BSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHPCF vs. BSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Public Limited Company - iShares S&P 500 UCITS ETF (IHPCF) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHPCF achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, IHPCF has outperformed BSV with an annualized return of 14.45%, while BSV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.


IHPCF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.03%
6M
9.25%
YTD
9.35%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
14.45%
ALL TIME*
13.48%

BSV

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.22%
6M
0.27%
YTD
0.42%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
1.90%
ALL TIME*
2.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$124.18M$168.72M$200.19M
$100.46K$144.05K$157.32K

IHPCF vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHPCF
iShares Public Limited Company - iShares S&P 500 UCITS ETF
9.35%17.89%25.53%25.05%-18.42%29.60%17.96%32.81%-6.68%20.97%
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
0.42%6.00%3.78%4.90%-5.49%-1.09%4.70%4.98%1.34%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IHPCF and BSV is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2008

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHPCF vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IHPCF
IHPCF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IHPCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHPCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHPCF Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IHPCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHPCF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BSV
BSV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IHPCF vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Public Limited Company - iShares S&P 500 UCITS ETF (IHPCF) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IHPCFBSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.33

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

7.21

+1.66

IHPCF vs. BSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHPCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the BSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHPCF and BSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHPCF vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHPCF drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHPCF and BSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHPCFBSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-8.54%

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-1.29%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-1.53%

-16.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.32%

-8.48%

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.40%

-8.54%

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.50%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-0.97%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

0.42%

+1.65%

Volatility

IHPCF vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Public Limited Company - iShares S&P 500 UCITS ETF (IHPCF) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.49%. This indicates that IHPCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHPCFBSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

0.49%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

1.41%

+9.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.06%

1.81%

+11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

2.74%

+14.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.66%

2.38%

+17.28%

Dividends

IHPCF vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison

IHPCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than BSV's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
3.68%3.83%3.38%2.46%1.50%1.45%1.79%2.29%1.99%1.65%1.48%1.40%
IHPCF
iShares Public Limited Company - iShares S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.87%0.69%1.03%1.23%1.43%1.03%1.32%1.49%1.77%0.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHPCF and BSV have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHPCF has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to BSV (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHPCF dropped -33.40% vs BSV's -8.54%.

BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHPCF and BSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer